currently i do 1 table sngs on stars and was wondering how the 2 table sngs for and if i should try both or just one of them
any opinions?
07-03-2005 03:51 PM
#1
| |
| |
07-03-2005 03:53 PM
#2
| |
Guest
|
How are you fairing at the 1 table SnGs? |
07-03-2005 04:05 PM
#3
| |
At 40 1 tables I have have a 45% ITM with a 25% ROI | |
07-03-2005 04:11 PM
#4
| |
Two table SnG's are a great way to increase your ROI, but you will trade off for a lower ITM and therfore higher variance. If return per hour of time invested is worth something to you, then they are certainly worth trying. | |
| |
07-03-2005 04:14 PM
#5
| |
| |
07-03-2005 09:46 PM
#6
| |
I primarily play 3 table SnGs to work on my MTT endgame. You don't get to the last 2-3 tables in a MTT every day so I want as much preactice as possible... | |
| |
07-03-2005 10:02 PM
#7
| |
Sed is right, these are great ways to tune up your MTT end game. I usually play 5 SnGs to every 1 MTSnG | |
| |
07-05-2005 03:01 PM
#8
| |
I like the increased ROI, but that's probably a matter of preference. On PS they pay just the top 4, so your ITM will drop, if that sounds bad don't go. You do get to practice going from a short table back to a full table, good for MTTs, and the stacks are (sometimes) a bit deeper when you get short handed so it's a little less of a push fest. | |