inducing a bluff with an overpair

[Pingviini]

This is a somewhat standard play for me but I decided to show this to you because we had some discussion about not betting on river in order to induce a bluff against a hand that wouldnt other wise put a dime in to the center. Also if he really had the flush I am saving a lot of money here. I didnt see any reason to bet that river. Looking at the results, I would have bet if I knew his hand. His bet is just ridiculous with a made hand IMO. Worse hands will fold and better hands will call. Text book example here folks.

WhyWhyWhy! is at seat 1 with 1247.95
Saalis is at seat 2 with 390.00
Balodis is at seat 3 with 155.30
werder34 is at seat 4 with 385.40
skriver is at seat 5 with 99.50

Saalis posts the large blind 4.00
WhyWhyWhy! posts the small blind 2.00

WhyWhyWhy!: --, --
Saalis: :Qd::Qs:
Balodis: --, --
werder34: --, --
skriver: --, --

Pre-flop:

Balodis: Fold
werder34: Call 4.00
skriver: Fold
WhyWhyWhy!: Call 4.00
Saalis: Raise 16.00
werder34: Call 16.00
WhyWhyWhy!: Fold

Flop Board:

Saalis: Bet 24.00
werder34: Call 24.00

Turn Board:

Saalis: Bet 48.00
werder34: Call 48.00

River Board:

Saalis: Check
werder34: Bet 100.00
Saalis: Call 100.00

Showdown:

werder34 shows: 4s, 6s (two pair, Sixes and Fives)
Saalis shows: Qd, Qs (two pair, Queens and Fives)

Mainpot:
Saalis wins the pot of 377.00 with two pair, Queens and Fives

(3.00 rake were taken for this hand)

[alias2211]

that was an awful raise at the end there. it's just way to far in the middle of a value bet for his full house and a valid stab at the pot that anyone who made a PRF for $16 would fold. great call, i feel you ping.

[Pingviini]

I wouldnt call this call great. I had my mouse on the call button right after I checked. If he has a boat there good for him. I pay it off every time here.

I could understand if he was bluffing with unimproved cards, other than AK or sorts, but that wasnt a value bet either. Just really stupid play on this part.