Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

PArty Poker now offers Black JAck

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    lolzzz_321's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    7,476
    Location
    My ice is polarized

    Default PArty Poker now offers Black JAck

    SO this is y their site was down...

    Discuss.
  2. #2
    Either fish will lose their money faster, or they will tilt on my tables cause they lost money in blackjack.

    hmmmm...
  3. #3
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    and sidebets on somestuff
  4. #4
  5. #5
    TheXianti: (Triptanes) why are you not a thinking person?
  6. #6
    Yay for PokerStars!
    TheXianti: (Triptanes) why are you not a thinking person?
  7. #7
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    you can 10 table now!!
  8. #8
    My only real concerns about the changes are
    • 1) the circus that Party has become -- gambler side bets and crap like that -- yuccch
      2) and that somehow they will consolidate PLuck and SLuck and other Party house variations out of the bonus heaven it has been and into one big PartyGaming platform with a single sign-on (and single bonus)
    Here's the press release: http://www.partygaming.com/images/ne...h_08_10_05.pdf
    I'm a know-it-all.




    No, really.
  9. #9
    I have mixed feelings about the blackjack. It'll either be acool feature that attracts more fish (a lot of my less-talented poker playing friends all love blackjack for some reason) but It's also bad because it gives the fish a place to lose money that's not us
  10. #10
    If you had two cards of one color, would taking a sidebet of the other color not be +EV?

    ex. You have two black cards leaving 50 cards left in the deck, 26 of which are red. Flopping one red card would be 26/50, the probability of flopping a second would be 25/49 and getting a 3rd would be 24/48.

    (26/50)x(25/49)x(24/48) = 0.13265
    1/8 = 0.125

    The sidebets pay 8:1. Is this not +EV, or am I approaching it wrong?
    This could open the door for colluders too although with a max sidebet of $0.50, I don't see how it would be worth taking the chance.
    TheXianti: (Triptanes) why are you not a thinking person?
  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by DaNutsInYoEye
    If you had two cards of one color, would taking a sidebet of the other color not be +EV?

    ex. You have two black cards leaving 50 cards left in the deck, 26 of which are red. Flopping one red card would be 26/50, the probability of flopping a second would be 25/49 and getting a 3rd would be 24/48.

    (26/50)x(25/49)x(24/48) = 0.13265
    1/8 = 0.125

    The sidebets pay 8:1. Is this not +EV, or am I approaching it wrong?
    This could open the door for colluders too although with a max sidebet of $0.50, I don't see how it would be worth taking the chance.
    when you place a sidebet, you are betting on the flop of the next hand. therefore, you don't get to see hole cards before you bet.

    on a side note, after pulling in +11BB/100 today, I love the new solo-party
  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Bmxicle
    Either fish will lose their money faster, or they will tilt on my tables cause they lost money in blackjack.

    hmmmm...
    quite agree with this
    I love poker
  13. #13
    Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,458
    Location
    California, USA
    I don't mind the blackjack.

    The change I don't like is the separation from the skins.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •