|
 Originally Posted by bdawg56kg
 Originally Posted by AHiltz
If you are willing to call an all-in, and aren't 90% sure that he will fire at it, value bet the river. Otherwise you are losing money.
Very true. This is great advice.
It is good advice. I'd like to show the other side of the coin for fairness. If you want a cheap showdown, but may be willing to call an all in, then it may be best to check. I'm hoping an opponent with a hand that beats me will price me in to a call, but if they don't then maybe I call anyway. The added element of the number of times an opponent bluffs all in may make it more +EV to me then betting the river and getting raised all in. In that case you're screwed.
I think the difference between calling an all in after checking, and calling an all in raise is significant. Should they be equated as one and the same?
I'm not entirely sure how to approach this small edge situation myself, but I figured I'd throw some angles into the mix. I don't advocate missing value on a river, but unless you're against a complete fish, what hand is hanging around here for a nice value bet? I guess any bare king.
|