|
<<So you guys saying a CR like this at 25 NL is almost never a semi bluff? And you wouldnt be CRing to set up a made flush or something? I really can be honest .. Since I have been playing ring, only for a month I dont really mess with drawing hands... They are a tad too expensive for my liking. You almost never get good odds to chase. Implied odds are great, but Iam starting to look towards the how do I defend my set against the FD'rs .... Suited connectors and suited shit arent part of my game right now.
Is overbetting like that as a donked up value bet profitable?>>
I've seen plenty of people call an overbet with a drawing hand, but at lower limits people almost always bet their hand. I've seen c/r bluffs from people who are tired of getting run over (they'll fold to a reraise), or those with monsters who want to get as much in the pot as possible.
If a lot of poeple are seeing the flop, drawing hands can be very profitable. People at lower limits love to chase flushes.
In your situation, overbetting would have had a higher likelihood of succeeding (on the river if you called all the way down) than a c/r. There it looks like a poorly executed bluff. Overbetting can work, people love to call at lower levels. Yesterday at Paradise $10NL I watched someone routinely push with the nuts. (AA preflop or top set post flop). Without fail he got called. (Unfortunately, I found this out the hard way by flopping a set of 3 on a 346 rainbow, a 4 fell on the turn he pushed and I called.)
Overbetting is more likely to get called than a "reasonable" bet in many cases. Then again, I'm not at $25NL much.
|