Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

Stats checkup: 10k hands at NL100 6-max (Party)

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Robert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,121
    Location
    Kokkedal, Denmark

    Default Stats checkup: 10k hands at NL100 6-max (Party)

    I just finished playing my first set of 10k hands at NL 100 6-max on party. This was mostly done through 4-tabling, but the last 3k are 6-tabling. Regarding my winrate, I think I'm running hot, cuz I've been doing plenty of mistakes and donkish moves and I still have lots of basic leaks to plug.

    One of many leaks in my game is openlimping to much. I should stop doing, and this could mostly be done by playing less hands UTG and UTG+1. The hands I still want to play in these positions I should openraise.

    I have no idea whatsoever on how to spot leaks by looking at PT stats, so any comments are VERY welcome. Feel free to rip my game appart, I know I have lots of leaks!



  2. #2
    johnny_fish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,103
    Location
    donkaments weeeeeeeeeeee
    You might want to tighten up in EP.. I know I needed too when I moved up from 100 to 200/400. Position gets more and more important then. Playing 20% of your hands UTG is probably -EV at higher levels.

    Hmm, just ignore that last statement btw. My 400NL stats are 23/12 overall, 23/16 BN, 16/12 UTG.. (w/r 11ptbb/100, running good..)
  3. #3
    Looks pretty good. A couple things you may want to do (you mentioned a couple):
    1. Decrease limping EP. Either fold or raise. Preferably fold so you are not OOP.
    2. Raise the button more especially when folded to or if one limper in front.

    This will get your VPIP and PFR number closer together.
  4. #4
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    looks good
  5. #5
    Robert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,121
    Location
    Kokkedal, Denmark
    Quote Originally Posted by gabe
    looks good
    Thx gabe, means a lot comin from you.
    But do you mean I should not tighten up in EP? I just thought I limp to many hands in EP (SCs, suited aces etc), when I should rather fold (because I will probably be playing a drawing hand OOP the rest of the hand). Or should I continue doing this on passive tables, but fold on aggressive ones?
  6. #6
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert
    continue doing this on passive tables, but fold on aggressive ones
    yup!

    you can even raise them on tight tables
  7. #7
    aislephive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,549
    Location
    Downswinging holla!
    Stats look fine for the most part, definitely cut out the open limping from your game. I'll limp behind a limper or two sometimes with a suited connector or suited ace, but I would never open limp with either. I also raised all PP's from any position other than the blinds, regardless of limpers. As you get to 200nl and up there are more players who will punish limpers by making positional raises to isolate on the limper, I myself do this with great frequency and good results.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •