Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

Anyone seen/use this monitor?

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Default Anyone seen/use this monitor?

    Westinghouse - 22" Widescreen Flat-Panel TFT-LCD Monitor

    Best buy had it for $350 in the store today
  2. #2
    1620 x 1050 = -EV
    Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.
  3. #3
    thenonsequitur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,311
    Location
    Location: Location
    Quote Originally Posted by Silly String
    1620 x 1050 = -EV
    Actually it's 1680 x 1050 (or 1600 x 1024). I have a 20.1" widescreen flatpanel that I run at 1680 x 1050, and it kicks ass (different monitor than the one the OP mentioned, but similar specifications).

    Not sure why you say this is -EV.

    I can play 4 tables with no overlap and 6 with not much overlap. But more importantly, having a widescreen monitor makes you look cooler.

    And newegg sells a good one--the BenQ--for ~$250, free shipping. Excellent deal IMO:

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16824014105
  4. #4
    I thought you had to have 1600x1200 to run 4 tables with no overlap? Unless you are talking about re-sizable tables. If I am wrong, then please disregard.
    Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.
  5. #5
    thenonsequitur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,311
    Location
    Location: Location
    Quote Originally Posted by Silly String
    I thought you had to have 1600x1200 to run 4 tables with no overlap? Unless you are talking about re-sizable tables. If I am wrong, then please disregard.
    If you want to be picky, it's true that to get absolutely no overlap with 4 tables, you have to reduce the table sizes by about 10%. But there's no reason to bother doing this, because the amount of overlap is negligable; you can still see all players, stacks, cards, and available playing options. You miss out on part of a chat window.

    With 6 tables, the overlap is not negligible, but it is not bad either; definitely still very playable. If you want to 8-table, 1600 x 1200 is definitely the minimum requirement.
  6. #6
    i had the 19" westinghouse HDTV/ 1440x900..

    then i switched to 2 x 20" 1600x1200.. i dont like any overlap at all.. but westinghouse hasnt given me any problems as a brand, and its the most affordable brand at best buy.

    the tv looks great still..
    Oldest TerryBlog (the good ole days): http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...oker-40661.htm

    Older TerryBlog (failed attempt #1):
    http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...887&highlight=
  7. #7
    Actually Silly, a 1680x1050 monitor should run in 1600 x 1200 mode, but I will check to make sure if I decide to get this one. I will probably wait until I see what congress does though first

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •