|
 Originally Posted by martindcx1e
there are also very nice advantages to being a full stack. doesn't it just kill you when you are forced to fold your small pp preflop cuz someone has raised too much to give you correct odds to set-hunt? or when you get something like a triple-up opportunity, and you could've made 200bb's but instead only made like 120?
sure. pendulum swings the other way, however. losing a large buy in is far more psychologically disrupting than losing a small one. im talking about certain structural advantages that force beneficial odds and such.
take this hand for example:
you're on a short stack, you have AK of diamonds in MP, you raise, get a few callers.
flop is all unders, no pair, two diamonds. a blind donks into you. your stack is about 3/4 the pot, you go all in.
if you're behind and drawing to a flush then you've ensured that you get to see two cards, thus providing much better odds. if you're deep then you cant go all in. you can just play the street and plan for the next. say the turn isn't a diamond, and the blind player bets big into youthen you may not be getting the odds to see the river. you now fold due to insufficient odds and assessment of opps' hand strength and a diamond comes on the river, or a K or A and a pair of overplayed tens takes down the pot.
also, bad players play badly all the time, but against shorties, they play even worse. i've had many times where i buy in for 40 bb, lose a few hands, get knocked down to 10bb, go all in with something like AK or JJ, and get called by a handful of guys with A7s, JT, 75, etc. if i win i quadruple up in one hand. make the play deep and you'll get called by much better hands.
|