Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1

    Default Squeeze

    Original raiser is tag, other is unknown. I don't want to call here OOP, but I think I lose value by folding.


    Full Tilt Poker
    No Limit Holdem Ring game
    Blinds: $0.50/$1
    6 players
    Converter

    Stack sizes:
    UTG: $100
    UTG+1: $108.75
    CO: $40
    Button: $154.30
    Hero: $106.70
    BB: $128.95

    Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is SB with Q A
    UTG raises to $5, UTG+1 folds, CO calls, Button folds, Hero raises to $16
    PSU Class of 2011 weeeeeeee!
  2. #2
    I usually dump this OOP.

    TAG + UTG raise = range that crushes AQ.

    Having said that if you are going to play it a reraise is probably best but its basically a bluff. I cant think of a situation (barring 2 pair+) that youre taking this to showdown so Id prefer it with 67s.
    gabe: Ive dropped almost 100k in the past 35 days.

    bigspenda73: But how much did you win?
  3. #3
    I disagree, I think KQ, AJ, ATs, and several lower PP are in his range here.
    PSU Class of 2011 weeeeeeee!
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelion
    I usually dump this OOP.

    TAG + UTG raise = range that crushes AQ.

    Having said that if you are going to play it a reraise is probably best but its basically a bluff. I cant think of a situation (barring 2 pair+) that youre taking this to showdown so Id prefer it with 67s.
    A _nit's_ raising range UTG crushes us, but we are ahead [it is close though] of a TAGs range:

    equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
    Hand 1: 47.5735 % 43.98% 03.59% { 22+, ATs+, KJs+, QJs, ATo+, KJo+, QJo }
    Hand 2: 52.4265 % 48.84% 03.59% { AQo }


    I dont really think I would go so far as to say that if we are 3betting here it is a bluff because I would say that we could get to showdown a decent amount of the time here with good pot control.

    Anyways, we are going to be ahead of a TAGs range here, but as you pointed out, that still doesnt always make a call a great play. We are OOP so itll make the hand harder to play when we arent the preflop aggressors; however, with a good postflop game it should still be +EV. Basically, I think folding here is too weak tight [although sometimes I would], but prefer 3betting over calling. If I were to guess Id probably 3bet here ~60% of the time, call 30% and fold 10%, those are all estimates but are jprobably pretty accurate.

    In the specific hand, your raise is very small which I dont really like. PF I really think all raises should be PSRs, so here thats what I think it should be. I also think we should be mixing it up by also doing this a certain percentage of the time with small PPs, big PPs, SCs, and some random trash.

    In short, this is fine and I would say standard [barring your raise size].
  5. #5
    Yea I had a lot of shit going on when this happened and the timer was running out... I'd probably raise this to around $20.

    When I say tag I mean 24/12... not a nit.
    PSU Class of 2011 weeeeeeee!
  6. #6
    I think I dump here. Three-betting lacks pot control that AQ needs. Calling is clearly a spew.
    Check out the new blog!!!
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
    I think I dump here. Three-betting lacks pot control that AQ needs. Calling is clearly a spew.
    We are ahead of a "standard" tags range here, how is calling spew? If you open utg, have an LP caller and are 3bet from the blinds, what hands do you call with?
  8. #8
    elipsesjeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4,826
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Quote Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
    I think I dump here. Three-betting lacks pot control that AQ needs. Calling is clearly a spew.
    No way! You have tons of value against most hands, and you're only way behind AK and QQ+, and I think your hand is fairly easy to play OOP, better than reraising. I don't like OP's 3x raise here, if you are going to squeeze this then at least 20, maybe even 24. I don't consider this raise a squeeze play and if you're called you have to put in a hefty continuation bet OOP without any idea of what your opponent has.

    I don't mind a call here at all, and i don't see myself ever folding this hand.

    By NEVER calling here, you take out many +EV options that coudn't have by Reraising.


    Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com

    More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
  9. #9
    standard
  10. #10
    Just call. You have a pretty good hand, but you'll be out of position for the rest of the hand, and the UTG tagg could be strong.
  11. #11
    As they say, finding good spots to squeeze is one of those required skills to be beating higher stakes, so very nice, atleast the effort :P
  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by dsaxton
    Just call. You have a pretty good hand, but you'll be out of position for the rest of the hand, and the UTG tagg could be strong.
    Ill ask the same question I asked Iowa, If you open UTG, have an LP caller and are then 3bet out of the blinds from a player who has not gotten out of line [which Harry definitely fits the profile of from my limited play with him], what hands are you calling here with?
  13. #13
    euphoricism's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    5,383
    Location
    Your place or my place
    I just had a similar hand, UTG makes it $3, moron super fish Limpy McLimpLimp in the CO coldcalls. folded to me in the BB with AQ.

    I made it 20. I think that was overkill, but I'm not sure what to do in that situation.
    <Staxalax> Honestly, #flopturnriver is the one thing that has improved my game the most.
    Directions to join the #flopturnriver Internet Relay Chat - Come chat with us!
  14. #14
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    i always raise here

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •