|
 Originally Posted by Doublethe7
I'm no big fan of the min-checkraise either, but in this case i'm happy with it. The reasoning: if he's got nothing he would fold, but i wouldnt have got any money out of him anyway. If he's got some kind of remote draw he'll call and i can get in an bigger bet on turn - i want him to chase his draw on turn, which worked fine.
Like the rest of the posts, I'm also not a fan of this check-raise. I agree you get an extra $3 out of someone who has nothing. But if you think a player has nothing, then you should just flat call, and check-raise the turn harder. Also, if villain has nothing, he won't call your min-checkraise. But if villain has something, he would call a bigger check-raise anyhow.
After your strong turn bet, and villain's flat call, I think its clear that villain was drawing to something. I might even check-call this river, to get a bet out of the missed OESD. I doubt any marginal hand would call a third barrel on the river. Maybe a set or two pair would call here, but I think we would have heard from those hands on previous streets.
|