I love bluff overbetting, I overbet with my strong made hands frequently enough to balance, and I've come to realize that a bluff overbet-specially on the river, is significantly more +ev than a psb or half psb. (in the right situation)

Example: I raise in CO with QJs BB calls

flop T53 check, I bet 3/4 he calls.

turn 2 check check

River 7 check I bet 1.2-1.4x pot he folds top pair and all underpairs which make up most of a caller in the BBs range which he doesnt CR or lead on turn or river. Theres lots of other situations- like where im pretty sure my opponent doesn't have a one card straight but will call a psb with one pair, 2pair or a set and my hand is less defined than his. Given my hand is undefined and consistent with hitting a scary river, all I have to do is find the bet size which cuts his odds down to the point where he cant profitable call with a decent made hand, without making my bet so big it looks ridiculously suspicious. Does this make sense? As it is something I want to incorporate into my game, in 3bet pots and other situations where I think I can get regs to fold overpairs, or TPTK.