Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

ATo blind battle line-check

Results 1 to 13 of 13

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default ATo blind battle line-check

    Villain is 20/16/3.5 over ~500 hands. We haven't really tangled... I've been aggressive but haven't shown down much. He built his stack by calling a big bluff from an uberdonk that has since left the table.

    What's your play here?

    Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Holdem Ring game - Blinds: $2/$4 - 6 players - Converter

    Stack sizes:
    UTG: $392.10
    UTG+1: $717.50
    CO: $499.50
    Button: $442
    Hero: $410
    BB: $742.90

    Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is SB with T A
    4 folds, Hero raises to $16, BB calls.

    Flop: T 3 2 ($32, 2 players)
    Hero bets $26, BB calls.

    Turn: 3 ($84, 2 players)
    Hero bets $70, BB calls.

    River: 6 ($224, 2 players)
    Hero...
  2. #2
    I would say you are ahead here around 90-95% of the time. J-10/K-10 makes up the biggest part of his range IMO, with 7-7/9-9 also possible. If he has any of those TP hands will probably call a small value bet. I just don't like the idea of firing OOP with only TPTK in such a big pot. 80-100 seems to be around the right size.

    I suppose in a blind battle villan might show up with a flush here sometimes, though i doubt often enough to stop me from value betting. If you were to check, would you fold to a large bet? Looking at villans stats and the limit, it seems as though he would know a river bet by him would look like a missed FD so wouldn't he only do it if he made his hand?
    Quote Originally Posted by Carroters
    Ambition is fucking great, but you're trying to dig up gold with a rocket launcher and are going to blow the whole lot to shit unless you refine your tools
  3. #3
    i'd bet prob 164.

    my reasoning is like Vi-Zer0Skill wrote, except i think a 100ish bet will look like value and he would be more likely to raise or fold, whereas a 160-190 bet can rep a 3 barell better and he'd more likely call/fold, while basically only raising if he got tricky and ur beat.
    164 is just the amount i bet last time i 3 barelled someone and they made the call with 88 for 3rd pair on a pretty dry board.
  4. #4
    bump

    Anyone like c/c, repping a missed heart draw and letting a missed heart draw bluff? What do we put him on here?
  5. #5
    AHiltz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,969
    Location
    Coldbrook, NS
    Quote Originally Posted by zook
    bump

    Anyone like c/c, repping a missed heart draw and letting a missed heart draw bluff? What do we put him on here?
    I dunno. What's his river aggression factor and/or reads that he will likely fire?

    I'd say it's 80/20 for betting / letting him bluff
  6. #6
    LOL just googled villain's sn and found out he's a CR instructor. Good thing to know. Doesn't look like he's doing a lot of recording these days, but maybe this hand will show up in his next video
  7. #7
    bet less on the turn. your hand isn't good enough to print money, and the river decision will be easier.

    i'd bet around $110 for value.
  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by zook
    bump

    Anyone like c/c, repping a missed heart draw and letting a missed heart draw bluff? What do we put him on here?
    I think a heart draw is a significant part of his range, as well as some TP and smaller pocket pairs.

    However, i dislike a c/c for two reasons

    1). He is very likely going to check behind the smaller one pair hands that you beat. You can probably get a value bet called by those hands at least half the time.
    2). I don't think he is going to bluff river big enough of the time to make value betting less EV. I don't think enough of his range is missed FD, and i think he is going to be bluffing with a missed flush less than half of the time. From his POV your line looks both like a big FD and a made but vulnerable hand. IMO if he thinks(knows? ) you are a good player he could also be afraid you will call his river bluff with a bigger missed FD knowing high card could be enough. idk about the last part but i love hero calls

    Paraphrased: I think villan will call a value bet(1/2PSB) slightly more than half of the time and bluff with a missed FD (3/4PSB-PSB)less than half the time, and therefore value betting is +EV.


    Looking at the hand again, I like bennys bet size best since we can assume villan can/likes to make big calls and may actually look up a larger sized bet a higher % of the time than he would a bet that looked like it was for value.
    Quote Originally Posted by Carroters
    Ambition is fucking great, but you're trying to dig up gold with a rocket launcher and are going to blow the whole lot to shit unless you refine your tools
  9. #9
    bet for value definitely as hes likely a pretty strong player if hes a CR instructor. 180 seems fine. hes never gonna bluff u in this spot and if he does its gonna be a shove which u cant call
    I got more flava than fruitstripe gum
  10. #10
    Wouldn't betting be folding out any hands we beat? Maybe K10 calls and MAYBE QJ...

    Why not check-call, hoping to induce a bluff from a missed heart or anything else?

    edit: Sorry, missed a few posts. I like your reasoning Zeroskill.
  11. #11
    I really don't think he has QJ .

    CR = cardrunners, right? I'm not a member, but i doubt he teaches people to play flush draws by passively calling near pot sized bets. Like sauce and benny said, make a pretty big bet, you allready said he built his stack by calling a big bluff.
  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by benny999
    i think a 100ish bet will look like value and he would be more likely to raise or fold, whereas a 160-190 bet can rep a 3 barell better and he'd more likely call/fold, while basically only raising if he got tricky and ur beat.
    I really like the thinking on this. In the heat of the moment i wouldn't even consider that villan could just push me off a TPTK hand by making a raise over what looks like a value bet. If we make a big bet he can only raise us if he has a significantly better hand (all i can think of is a flush).


    Quote Originally Posted by larsmars
    CR = cardrunners, right? I'm not a member, but i doubt he teaches people to play flush draws by passively calling near pot sized bets.
    Good point. I agree that checking hoping to induce a bluff from a missed FD is unlikely to succeed since that probably isn't what he has after he calls the turn.
    Quote Originally Posted by Carroters
    Ambition is fucking great, but you're trying to dig up gold with a rocket launcher and are going to blow the whole lot to shit unless you refine your tools
  13. #13
    Ok, I'm on board that turn bet is a little big and betting the river is better than checking.

    For the results oriented...

    Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is SB with T A
    4 folds, Hero raises to $16, BB calls.

    Flop: T 3 2 ($32, 2 players)
    Hero bets $26, BB calls.

    Turn: 3 ($84, 2 players)
    Hero bets $70, BB calls.

    River: 6 ($224, 2 players)
    Hero checks, BB bets $148, Hero calls.

    Results:
    Final pot: $520
    BB showed Ac 3d
    Hero mucks Ts Ad

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •