Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

wtf easy call in sng, is it in cash?

Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. #1

    Default wtf easy call in sng, is it in cash?

    Ok im wading into 6 max guys, auto call?

    PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

    Hero ($90)
    BB ($171)
    UTG ($132.70)
    MP ($90.40)
    CO ($100)
    Button ($104.05)

    Preflop: Hero is SB with J, J.
    4 folds, Hero raises to $4, BB raises to $171
  2. #2
    Insta-call.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord
    Insta-call.
    How is this an insta-call? Seems like a small favorite/huge dog scenario. A junky KQ is nearly 50/50 with us, and if he has QQ+ we're crushed. I could see if we were getting better odds, but his range would need to be 99+/AQ+ for us to be break even here.
    Some days it feels like I've been standing forever, waiting for the bank teller to return so I can cash in all these Sklansky Bucks.
  4. #4
    insta-fold.
  5. #5
    With all due respect, Fnord, this is usually a donk with QQ+, sometimes AK. Insta-fold, insta-call if you're feeling gambly.
  6. #6
    As a SnG player who knows the mathematics of blind battles very well, I'm sure you understand why this has to be a call. I call with TT+ AQs AK because folding isn't very baller.
  7. #7
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    I fold this with no reads. Im not that happy about it though.

    Trik, what stakes of sngs do you usually play? just curious.
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by mcatdog
    As a SnG player who knows the mathematics of blind battles very well, I'm sure you understand why this has to be a call. I call with TT+ AQs AK because folding isn't very baller.
    90BB effective stacks and no time pressure to accumulate chips makes this an easy fold.
    Some days it feels like I've been standing forever, waiting for the bank teller to return so I can cash in all these Sklansky Bucks.
  9. #9
    No reads? Nothing? How could this be an insta-call against an unknown player?
  10. #10
    If it wouldn't be a blind on blind battle I would fold in an instant. But I have seen this often to be AQo and the like. I am leaning towards calling about 60/40.
  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Bode-ist
    I fold this with no reads. Im not that happy about it though.

    Trik, what stakes of sngs do you usually play? just curious.
    114s mostly. Its the highest level on stars you can play and turn a profit. After that the play is just 2 solid and my roi is 2 low to play them.
  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by mcatdog
    As a SnG player who knows the mathematics of blind battles very well, I'm sure you understand why this has to be a call. I call with TT+ AQs AK because folding isn't very baller.
    I would never call this with AQs being that this is AK half the time.


    Btw i did call thinking he had AK and he did. I won the hand. I dont know if I would do this at higher stakes though, but i could resist gambooling at 100nl.
  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by KoRnholio
    How is this an insta-call? Seems like a small favorite/huge dog scenario. A junky KQ is nearly 50/50 with us, and if he has QQ+ we're crushed. I could see if we were getting better odds, but his range would need to be 99+/AQ+ for us to be break even here.
    Put him on a range that includes KQ and then see whether we're "crushed" by it. BTW I'm sure that if you were the one in the SB, and the BB was shoving 99+, AQ+ over your raises, he'd win a lot of money off of you in the long run. He could push a much wider range than that actually. That doesn't mean shoving 100 BB is the best way to play, it just shows how bad it is to fold hands as strong as JJ heads-up.

    Cash game players like to make fun of donkament players but I think donkament players have a much better understanding of what hands you can profitably get all-in preflop with, depending on your position and stack size. They've actually done the math on how likely each hand is to be beat. It's not difficult math. It takes like a couple of hours maybe, and what with how aggressive the games are getting and people getting AI pre-flop a lot more often, I think it would behoove cash game players to do this math as well.

    Cliff notes: don't fold JJ heads-up for 100 BB. Unless villain is piscogay, then you can fold.

    Trifklow, I just don't think you can narrow his range down that much to being AK half the time. Someone who sucks enough to play like this is probably doing the same thing with a lot of worse hands too. TT and AQs are borderline for sure, but a policy of pretty much never folding them heads-up hasn't really hurt me you'd be surprised how often I have the best hand when I get all-in with them.
  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by mcatdog
    Quote Originally Posted by KoRnholio
    How is this an insta-call? Seems like a small favorite/huge dog scenario. A junky KQ is nearly 50/50 with us, and if he has QQ+ we're crushed. I could see if we were getting better odds, but his range would need to be 99+/AQ+ for us to be break even here.
    Put him on a range that includes KQ and then see whether we're "crushed" by it. BTW I'm sure that if you were the one in the SB, and the BB was shoving 99+, AQ+ over your raises, he'd win a lot of money off of you in the long run. He could push a much wider range than that actually. That doesn't mean shoving 100 BB is the best way to play, it just shows how bad it is to fold hands as strong as JJ heads-up.
    KQo is actually 1% better against JJ than AQo is. So adding KQ really doesn't change much. Pokerstove shows JJ at 51.3% equity against 99+/KQ/AQ+, and 50.2% equity without the KQ in there.


    Cash game players like to make fun of donkament players but I think donkament players have a much better understanding of what hands you can profitably get all-in preflop with, depending on your position and stack size.
    I started as mainly a donkament NLH and LHE/PL Omaha cash game player. I've only just recently gotten into NL cash games. But it seems that one of the major adjustments is that most people don't just go all in preflop with any old 2 big cards like they do with <20 BBs in a tournament.

    Cliff notes: don't fold JJ heads-up for 100 BB. Unless villain is piscogay, then you can fold.

    Trifklow, I just don't think you can narrow his range down that much to being AK half the time. Someone who sucks enough to play like this is probably doing the same thing with a lot of worse hands too. TT and AQs are borderline for sure, but a policy of pretty much never folding them heads-up hasn't really hurt me you'd be surprised how often I have the best hand when I get all-in with them.
    A read is really needed before you start calling 100BB all ins with very low odds. If I had seen this guy do this kind of raise before, then we can start widening his range and loosening our calls. But against an unknown at 100NL who pushes his whole stack over your 4BB raise, you'll very often end up against either AA, KK, QQ or AK. Huge dog, huge dog, huge dog and small favorite, respectively.

    There just aren't that many players that are going to be pushing 100BBs as their first reraise with hands like AJ and 1010 at 100NL. I've started my 6max "career" at 50NL, and people are generally very tight with their 3bets. Sure there are a few maniacs, but against an unknown a strong hand is almost a given.
    Some days it feels like I've been standing forever, waiting for the bank teller to return so I can cash in all these Sklansky Bucks.
  15. #15
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord
    Insta-call.
  16. #16
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    ARRRRRR-IN!!!
  17. #17
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    fold if the guy is a huge huge nit, or call and let him hit top set but backdoor a straight, that's probably your best bet.
  18. #18
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    tell us what you know already, even if nothing
  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by mcatdog
    Cliff notes: don't fold JJ heads-up for 100 BB. Unless villain is piscogay, then you can fold.
    Wow, he must have really nitted up since the last time I played him. Total spew monkey.
  20. #20
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Cash game players like to make fun of donkament players but I think donkament players have a much better understanding of what hands you can profitably get all-in preflop with, depending on your position and stack size. They've actually done the math on how likely each hand is to be beat. It's not difficult math. It takes like a couple of hours maybe, and what with how aggressive the games are getting and people getting AI pre-flop a lot more often, I think it would behoove cash game players to do this math as well.
    i think you badly underestimate good mid-high stakes cash game players in this regard.
  21. #21
    Results: You called, he flipped ATo or something equally shitty.
  22. #22
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by Trikflow77
    Quote Originally Posted by mcatdog
    As a SnG player who knows the mathematics of blind battles very well, I'm sure you understand why this has to be a call. I call with TT+ AQs AK because folding isn't very baller.
    I would never call this with AQs being that this is AK half the time.


    Btw i did call thinking he had AK and he did. I won the hand. I dont know if I would do this at higher stakes though, but i could resist gambooling at 100nl.
  23. #23
    i call because his range contains A2s
    I got more flava than fruitstripe gum
  24. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    i think you badly underestimate good mid-high stakes cash game players in this regard.
    Possibly. I'm only going by the posts I've read on here and 2p2. You've actually played in those games so you'd know a lot better than I would. From your posts you seem to understand pre-flop equities pretty well, but there have to be a lot of players who don't, otherwise guys like IMSAKIDD and stinkypete wouldn't be profitable.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •