Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

Interesting river spot

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1

    Default Interesting river spot

    Villain in this hand is Ken the Cow. he runs about 22/16 on my PT, is pretty aggro but not crazy at all. I really have never seen him do anything out of line.

    I'm pretty sure that he'd reraise AQ preflop here, so i'm 90% sure i'm winning. It's really just a simple bet or check, but i'm unsure which is better.

    PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $4 BB (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

    UTG ($104.40)
    MP ($572)
    Button ($446.70)
    Hero ($650.60)
    BB ($459.35)

    Preflop: Hero is SB with K, Q.
    1 fold, MP raises to $16, 1 fold, Hero calls $14, BB calls $12.

    Flop: ($48) J, Q, 4 (3 players)
    Hero bets $32, BB calls $32, MP folds.

    Turn: ($112) 5 (2 players)
    Hero bets $76, BB calls $76.

    River: ($264) 7 (2 players)
    Hero bets $176

    Final Pot: $264
  2. #2
    thumbs up!

    also i would 3bet this preflop often but not always
    I got more flava than fruitstripe gum
  3. #3
    mixchange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,863
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    I go super value at $85. His hand if he does have a weaker kicker Q or a J doesn't look callable for 3/4 pot river bet. But it might look fine for $70, it might look like a missed draw... for $85 its hard for him to fold if hes got a piece but for 176 its an easy fold unless he's got you.
  4. #4
    I would only make the river bet a bit more, unless you are trying to make a bet that looks like its for value so if he calls you can bet a missed draw the same way in the future.
    Quote Originally Posted by Carroters
    Ambition is fucking great, but you're trying to dig up gold with a rocket launcher and are going to blow the whole lot to shit unless you refine your tools
  5. #5
    u can also C/C any bet which may be better
    I got more flava than fruitstripe gum
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by sauce123
    u can also C/C any bet which may be better
    lol, this is my question.

    It's really just a simple bet or check, but i'm unsure which is better.
    I don't think he'll bluff here very much though, doesn't seem like a good spot. But then again, i think he's rarely calling my bet.
  7. #7
    i sometimes bet 1/3-ish pot and maybe call a raise...agree its a close decision though. a big bet seems good too, whatever might get a curiosity call.
  8. #8
    if ur unknown to ken i might bet 120 and call a raise
    I got more flava than fruitstripe gum
  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by sauce123
    if ur unknown to ken i might bet 120 and call a raise
    I'm not unknown to him, we've just barely ever tangled. I just think 120 or below is obvious value and is almost never getting called. It seems like a lot of 400NL regs think people are bluffing a lot more often than they do, so i made the smallest bet that is still hard enough to look like a possible bluff.
  10. #10
    you'd be very surprised at how bad people call off here. Easy bet.
    Check out the new blog!!!
  11. #11
    this is such a common spot, so i made a summary of thoughts on betting small vs big...

    small:
    room for a bluff-raise
    better odds to call ("for info" etc)

    big:
    looks more like "monster or air" which may make him more likely to call and merges your range some
    if he folds, he may be more curious later if u do the same line

    i guess it depends how important metagame vs immediate value is, since i think a $75-ish bet gets called/raised a lot more than a large bet.
  12. #12
    There are strong arguments for both betting and checking.

    I think you want to play this for value while avoiding any tough decisions.
    I think checking best acheives this as a check may lead your opponent to bluff or bet a weaker hand that he now thinks is good as a result of your check, allowing you to make an easy call.
    I cant see him calling a big bet here and wouldnt be suprised if he raised a small one sensing weakness. So for me betting looks like poorer/similiar value while creating tougher decisions for yourself.

    It looks like hes on a flush draw here, which means that checking is the optimum play as he may spike a bluff on his missed draw, whereas betting will only result in a fold.
  13. #13
    I don't understand why villain would think Massimo is bluffing no matter what size he bets the river, and it sure looks like villain could have been on a draw, so I'm gonna go with check/call. I agree that it's a terrible spot for villain to bluff, but lol they always bet.
  14. #14
    Could you guys please explain the thought processes behind the preflop call
    He who drinks beer sleeps well.
    He who sleeps well cannot sin.
    He who does not sin goes to Heaven.
  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by SmackinYaUp
    Could you guys please explain the thought processes behind the preflop call
    threebetting is as lot better but since we can play a pair for decent value its not a
    -EV call.
    Check out the new blog!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •