Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFull Ring NL Hold'em

JJ in SB (100NL)

Results 1 to 25 of 25
  1. #1

    Default JJ in SB (100NL)

    PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (9 handed) Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

    UTG ($118.10)
    UTG+1 ($43.95)
    MP1 ($94.15)
    MP2 ($159.55)
    MP3 ($98.40)
    CO ($278.05)
    Button ($151.45)
    Hero ($100)
    BB ($100)

    Preflop: Hero is SB with J, J.
    1 fold, UTG+1 calls $1, 1 fold, MP2 calls $1, 3 folds, Hero completes, BB checks.

    Flop: ($4) 5, 3, 7 (4 players)
    Hero bets $3, BB folds, UTG+1 folds, MP2 calls $3.

    Turn: ($10) T (2 players)
    Hero bets $6, MP2 calls $6.

    River: ($22) 3 (2 players)
    Hero checks, MP2 bets $10, Hero calls $10.

    Final Pot: $42


    I never know how to play these weak overpair kinda hands... Villain was unknown...I had only played a rotation or two at this table. All his calling had me worried about a slowplay.
  2. #2
    spoonitnow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    14,219
    Location
    North Carolina
    I prefer to raise preflop here, but everything post-flop seems fine. You have to value bet the flop and turn since your hand is very under-represented, and I like the river check/call since we're not *extremely* strong.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by spoonitnow
    I prefer to raise preflop here, but everything post-flop seems fine. You have to value bet the flop and turn since your hand is very under-represented, and I like the river check/call since we're not *extremely* strong.
    Yeah I figured the river was a WA/WB situation so a check/call was in order.

    You'd pre-flop raise jacks from SB with limpers behind?

    If I was on the button, I'd agree...I just feel like too many times have I raised pre-flop with limpers behind only to get in a multi-way out of position with overcards on the flop and I've gotta lay it down.

    I generally play JJ TT like a low PP, but if the board comes low, I'll bet it like this.

    Leak in my game?

    As it turns out, the villain here was calling me down with Q4o (wtf?) I didn't think people did shit like that in 100NL. I just moved up from 25/50NL so I'm a little insecure with my game at this level...
  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up
    Pre-flop is up to you, I would raise to isolate. This disguises your hand and you get to stack-a-fish when you get a set OR steal the pot when flop is ace or king high. Post flop all good. Nice hand.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by daven
    Pre-flop is up to you, I would raise to isolate.
    wow. Preflop is a mandatory value raise. Not raising here is leaving alot of money on the table.

    In the hand, I'd bet the river.
  6. #6
    spoonitnow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    14,219
    Location
    North Carolina
    Quote Originally Posted by d0zer
    Quote Originally Posted by spoonitnow
    I prefer to raise preflop here, but everything post-flop seems fine. You have to value bet the flop and turn since your hand is very under-represented, and I like the river check/call since we're not *extremely* strong.
    Yeah I figured the river was a WA/WB situation so a check/call was in order.

    You'd pre-flop raise jacks from SB with limpers behind?

    If I was on the button, I'd agree...I just feel like too many times have I raised pre-flop with limpers behind only to get in a multi-way out of position with overcards on the flop and I've gotta lay it down.

    I generally play JJ TT like a low PP, but if the board comes low, I'll bet it like this.

    Leak in my game?

    As it turns out, the villain here was calling me down with Q4o (wtf?) I didn't think people did shit like that in 100NL. I just moved up from 25/50NL so I'm a little insecure with my game at this level...
    Like daven said, I also raise to isolate. A raise makes it much less likely to be out of position against multiple players with the added bonus that you'll just pick up the pot here a good portion of the time as well. With TT/99 it depends on the players who limped and the BB, but for JJ it's almost always a raise for me. However, I don't think a limp is an absolutely overly huge mistake or anything, I just think a raise to $6 or $7 is a bit better.

    And yeah, sometimes players do really weird stuff at 100nl. I see it a lot in limped pots especially.

    This hand made me think about how lately I've been re-evaluating how I play top pair or weak overpairs on limped boards from the blinds. You're almost always out of position against multiple opponents and the pot is fairly small, so I found myself not betting a lot of times when it was likely I had the best hand just so I wouldn't have to deal with the situation. I'm starting to think that it's possible that I was just avoiding a situation I wasn't comfortable with instead of trying to make the best plays.
  7. #7
    BankItDrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    8,291
    Location
    Losing Prop Bets
    How often do players limp QQ+ in this situation? >50%! raise preflop

    cbet

    practice turn and post hand histories
  8. #8
    BankItDrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    8,291
    Location
    Losing Prop Bets
    Quote Originally Posted by d0zer
    However, I don't think a limp is an absolutely overly huge mistake or anything
    it's a huge mistake because you do not benefit as much otherwise. Decisions postflop need to be as easy as possible, raising preflop will accomplish this.
  9. #9
    XTR1000's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,548
    Location
    surfing in a room
    Quote Originally Posted by d0zer
    the villain here was calling me down with Q4o
    thats why this hand should be a raise preflop. ppl at 100NL limp some crazy stuff and make postflop decisions in limped pots very hard. You will be oop with a good but not great hand and it sucks to play against a villian who limps like 50% of his hands.

    In a raised pot JJ can easily survive one overcard flopping, while in limped pots even all-under-flops can become dangerous.

    as played postflop is fine. Leading river or not is kinda read dependant, check against opponents who cant resist to stealbet with missed draws, against unknowns I´d like a lead tho.
    Quote Originally Posted by bigred View Post
    xtr stand for exotic tranny retards
    yo
  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by BankItDrew
    How often do players limp QQ+ in this situation? >50%! raise preflop

    cbet

    practice turn and post hand histories
    I'll never limp QQ+... I dunno why I treat jacks differently. Probably because I'm more likely to shut down with Jacks when the flop brings overcards, but maybe I should stop being such a nit and bet jacks with a raised pot even WITH overcards.

    Here's a situation I found myself in with Jacks...I probably could have played it better. Sorry no HH.

    Jacks in the CO, no limpers. TAG behind me raised it up to $5, I call.

    Flop comes 779 or something like that. villain bets $10, I raise to $40, he pushes me all-in. He had $150 starting and I had $120. It was another $80 for me to call and I laid down my jacks figuring he had QQ+.

    Should I have done my re-raising pre-flop? I really had him put on a AJ/AQ/AK c-bet, hence the re-raise, but I really don't think he woulda pushed there without a strong overpair...
  11. #11
    XTR1000's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,548
    Location
    surfing in a room
    if I get that hand right u limp/called?
    Quote Originally Posted by bigred View Post
    xtr stand for exotic tranny retards
    yo
  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by XTR1000
    if I get that hand right u limp/called?
    The JJ hand I was talking about in my previous post, I had position on the villain, and flat called his raise.
  13. #13
    XTR1000's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,548
    Location
    surfing in a room
    personally I like to 3bet in these spots, unless I have a read that villians raising very tight, in which case I simply play for set. Jacks were a huge loser in my game until I started 3betting them.

    It´s just so hard to play and those situations u described will either cost u a lot or make u only a pfr plus the occasional cbet.
    Quote Originally Posted by bigred View Post
    xtr stand for exotic tranny retards
    yo
  14. #14
    spoonitnow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    14,219
    Location
    North Carolina
    Quote Originally Posted by BankItDrew
    Quote Originally Posted by d0zer
    However, I don't think a limp is an absolutely overly huge mistake or anything
    it's a huge mistake because you do not benefit as much otherwise. Decisions postflop need to be as easy as possible, raising preflop will accomplish this.
    I actually wrote that, not dozer

    It's obviously a mistake that shouldn't be repeated but I think I meant huge in the context of not costing a hero massive shit ton of value like other mistakes can.
  15. #15
    So the 'standard' line for jacks is to raise limpers (even OOP), and 3bet a single raiser?

    Fold to re-raises?

    I know jacks are a group1 hand and all, but it seems like in a full-ring game they screw me more than not. Maybe I'm being too 'results oriented'.

    Or maybe I've just played too many tournies, where jacks are a danger hand early, and a fantastic hand to push with late?
  16. #16
    XTR1000's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,548
    Location
    surfing in a room
    Your probably too "hand-categorie oriented" . JJ can be a monster or total trash.

    Position, stacks, action to you, players left to act, reads on opponents should dermine your play.
    Quote Originally Posted by bigred View Post
    xtr stand for exotic tranny retards
    yo
  17. #17
    BankItDrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    8,291
    Location
    Losing Prop Bets
    Quote Originally Posted by d0zer
    So the 'standard' line for jacks is to raise limpers (even OOP), and 3bet a single raiser?

    Fold to re-raises?

    I know jacks are a group1 hand and all, but it seems like in a full-ring game they screw me more than not. Maybe I'm being too 'results oriented'.

    Or maybe I've just played too many tournies, where jacks are a danger hand early, and a fantastic hand to push with late?
    Maybe you are getting screwed with them more often than not in full ring because you slowplay them preflop and allow as many villains to see the flop as possible.
  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by BankItDrew
    Maybe you are getting screwed with them more often than not in full ring because you slowplay them preflop and allow as many villains to see the flop as possible.
    I used to raise with em' for isolation, but it seemed like they always ended up costing me more than I ever got with em', so I started playing em' basically like small PPs...

    Maybe I made too many c-bets on overcard flops and got traumatized by getting check-raised too many times...I dunno.

    Regardless...I'm convinced. From now on, no slowplaying jacks. But I'll still probably shut down on overcard flops vs anyone prone to check-raising...
  19. #19
    I would raise here for a few reasons, the UTG call could well be aces and i'd rather find out sooner than later. I also feel vulnarable to a big ace/ medium pair from MP2 and many people will fold it to a raise out of the blinds.
    post flop i would go pot sized but 75% is good, you have got to think you ahead any bigger pocket pair would be raising not calling. Because of the preflop action i would be concerned about a set probably sevens and would back off the aggression turn and river seem good. Not sure i would have called the river bet even though you won, it was a good call.
  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by hopeful
    Not sure i would have called the river bet even though you won, it was a good call.
    Carefull. Don't go calling it a good call because he won...that is results oriented thinking.

    Instead, decide if it was a good or bad call based on the action, or this player, or his betting range or whatever, but not based on the outcome.
    Stakes: Playing $0.10/$0.25 NL
  21. #21
    jesus christ, raise PF.
    TheXianti: (Triptanes) why are you not a thinking person?
  22. #22
    Raising pre is for nits.
  23. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    Raising pre is for nits.
    Quote Originally Posted by DaNutsInYoEye
    jesus christ, raise PF.
    Hrrmmmm.....

    *scratches balls inquisitively*

  24. #24
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    raise pre, as played, bet river.
  25. #25
    It was a jopke.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •