100NL, 5 handed with 100bb stacks. Complete unknown UTG raises to $3.50, I call with AT
next to act and the rest of the table folds. I think pf is pretty bad but whatever.
Flop ($8.50): KQ
K
Villain pots it, whats my move?
12-13-2007 08:44 PM
#1
| |
| |
12-13-2007 09:23 PM
#2
| |
call, fold turn if u dont hit ur royal, ok str8 or flush will do also | |
| |
12-14-2007 12:53 PM
#3
| |
i call and if checked to on turn i bet 1/2 pot regardless or whether i hit or not. I f he pots the turn again then i fold if i haven't improved. | |
12-14-2007 03:02 PM
#4
| |
i just want to emphasize that calling pre is pretty bad. | |
| |
12-14-2007 05:52 PM
#5
| |
God we have such crappy reverse implied odds and horrible implied odds. | |
| |
12-14-2007 07:42 PM
#6
| |
![]() ![]()
|
just like in the other combo draw thread i don't get why we're calling again? i'm convinced we're screwin ourselves by trying to maximise ev against a small part of his range, and ignorin the majority. |
12-14-2007 08:00 PM
#7
| |
Well firstly xyu I think you are over estimating the ammount of times the villain will double barrel this turn with a hand worse that ours. Most 100NL guys are doing this pretty much never so the possibility of us getting bluffed off the best hand is slim. | |
12-14-2007 08:17 PM
#8
| |
![]() ![]()
|
yeah, i don't expect too many double barrels at NL$100, for some reason i ignored that. |
12-15-2007 03:09 PM
#9
| |
why is calling pre so bad again? | |
| |
12-15-2007 03:17 PM
#10
| |
Its 100nl and a guy raised UTG, there are still 4 people behind who possibly can reraise, we have really bad reverse implied odds. | |
| |
12-15-2007 03:17 PM
#11
| |
I mean its not horrible by any means but its not something i'd do. | |
| |