|
I would say that maybe one in four of my buttons raises is 3-bet from the blinds (it may be slightly less and just feels like one in four, but still, it's easily regular enough for me to not feel that AK is behind).
My problem with 4-betting pre-flop is that I have to fold to a push 200bbs deep, don't I? So my thinking was that my range is at least 50/50 here and I have position, so a call is fine.
On the flop, the pf 3-bettor basically has to bet here, so my call was a mixture of pot control and providing him with the least info. On this flop my range is even further ahead as TT-QQ, AQ are now way behind. So I call to see the turn.
Now, his turn bet. It's either a 2nd barrel bluff which he hopes will make me fold my mid/high PP, flush draw or AQ/AJ, or it's a value bet claiming real strength and a willingness to get it all in on the river. This is where I lose track a bit. My instinct and experience at this level tells me that a large turn bet in a re-raised pot is likely to be kosher, and if it is, it's really hard to see what I am beating here (though AK is a significant part of his range too). With 100BBs, I can't see myself finding a fold here with the potential downside being that much smaller, but with 200? Tricky.
The river is one of those horrible cards which looks fantastic but really, what am I suddenly beating? Essentially nothing, yet he is happy to play for big stacks. So the question is: do I win here 30% of the time +? And the answer is: only if I'm playing a maniac or a terrible lagg or someone on tilt. And so far I have no evidence to indicate any of these are the case.
Thanks for all the responses - 17 is a pretty good number! The villain was holding 66.
|