Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

Dalecooper theorem..?

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1

    Default Dalecooper theorem..?

    Villain is standard TAgg without much history. Don't know how he got his stack in this session; in a previous session with him he played ABC poker well enough to beat these stakes, but not well enough to beat me. He's a little above average on aggression but not a spewmonkey.

    The theorem (with little field testing so far) says that if a villain check/calls the flop + donk leads on the turn, without significant change in board texture, he's not that strong. He may have a little something he'd like to show down, or he may be blocking for a draw. In this case if the theorem holds, I should refuse to give him credit for better than a pair of queens. His range on the turn according to the theorem is Qx, JJ, TT, 99, 88, 7x, and flush draws.

    How's this?

    Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (6 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

    BB ($80.30)
    UTG ($49.50)
    Hero (MP) ($51.25)
    CO ($23.25)
    Button ($16.85)
    SB ($69.20)

    Preflop: Hero is MP with :Kc: :Kh:
    UTG calls $0.50, Hero raises to $2.50, 2 folds, SB calls $2.25, 1 fold, UTG calls $2

    Flop: ($8.50) :Qs: (3 players)
    SB checks, UTG checks, Hero bets $6, SB calls $6, 1 fold

    Turn: ($20.50) (2 players)
    SB bets $12.50, Hero calls $12.50

    River: ($45.50) (2 players)
    SB bets $48.20 (All-In), Hero calls $30.25 (All-In)

    Total pot: $106 | Rake: $3
  2. #2
    most of the time I think you're right against most opps, and this hand was played perfectly


  3. #3
    That line is so bluffy, and I never give it any respect when a bad player pulls it off. Unless of course villain is one of those types that always leads his strong hands and never check-raises.

    I love to use villain's line against thinking opponents when I turn something good.
  4. #4
    HOLY SHIT...YOU'RE RIGHT
    I must fail at executing though.



    $0.1/$0.25 No Limit Holdem
    7 players
    Converted at weaktight.com

    Stacks:
    UTG ($18.85)
    UTG+1 ($27.55)
    MP ($8.75)
    Hero ($21.10)
    BTN ($24.30)
    SB ($24.70)
    BB ($15.00)

    Pre-flop: ($0.35, 7 players) Hero is CO
    UTG calls $0.25, 2 folds, Hero raises to $1.25, 3 folds, UTG calls $1

    Flop: ($2.85, 2 players)
    UTG checks, Hero bets $2, UTG calls $2

    Turn: ($6.85, 2 players)
    UTG bets $3.50, Hero goes all-in $17.85, UTG goes all-in $12.10

    River: ($40.30, 2 players)

    Final Pot: $38.05
    UTG shows:
    Hero shows:

    UTG wins $36.20 ( won +$17.35 )
    Hero wins $2.25 ( lost -$18.85 )
  5. #5
    squeaky that hand is horrible
    Flopping quads and boats like its my job
  6. #6
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    Dammit, you owe me $30!!!

    Just kidding, mostly I agree, but sometimes people take this line with the nuts. Dunno why. If you're gonna slowplay a set on the flop, why donk the turn if it didnt get scary/likely improve my hand?

    Coz I figure you're bluffing I guess
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by thizzSantaCruz
    squeaky that hand is horrible
    Looks fine to me, but clearly villain was way too loose to care about calling off the last half of his stack with ace high. Gotta love the micros.

    bjsaust - the theorem offers no refunds. Yeah, I'd caution you to be careful with it - especially tricky or especially retarded villains may be immune to its cold, calculating logic.
  8. #8
    Results on this hand: Villain had AQ and the kings are goot.
  9. #9
    Theorem footnote: I'd warn practitioners to take a close look at the turn card when sizing up a surprise donk bet. Let's take a pretty average, somewhat coordinated flop:

    :Qd:

    Raised pot of course. Villain checks, you bet with any two cards, and villain calls. The turn card is...

    :Ts:

    ...and villain donks. Why? Well a couple things may have happened here: 1. Villain had a flush draw (say, Ad Jd or Ad Td) and has now added a straight draw or a pair to it. 2. Villain had a pocket pair like TT, and has just hit a miracle set. 3. Villain had top pair (QT) and has now made two pair.

    The key thing about this card is that in all cases it did two things: A. improved the villain's hand strength, and B. made the board texture more dangerous, which is possibly what induces him to donk (don't want to run the risk of letting it check through).

    So for these reasons, a ten (even a non-diamond ten) on the turn may poke some holes in the theorem. But a 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 here probably changes nothing - it's not improving much of villain's likely range, unless he's really loose and bad.
  10. #10
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    Yeah, I was going to add that. If they are slowplaying and the turn makes the board more dangerous for their hand they'll sometimes donk out.
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  11. #11
    ive a few hands from last night where i tried this stuff out
    Jman: every time the action is to you, it's an opportunity for you to make the perfect play.
  12. #12
    i missed read his stack size but i think our poitn is valid.

    67/15 over 144 hands. 45% A%. 43% Fold2cb

    $1/$2 No Limit Holdem
    6 players
    Converted at weaktight.com

    Stacks:
    UTG sonicen ($50.45)
    UTG+1 gadi12345 ($109.60)
    CO DOLLARIHYMY ($197.00)
    BTN Hero ($190.75)
    SB Balian123 ($195.00)
    BB hardtoplease ($295.98)

    Pre-flop: ($3, 6 players) Hero is BTN
    1 fold, gadi12345 calls $2, 1 fold, Hero raises to $9, 2 folds, gadi12345 calls $7

    Flop: ($21, 2 players)
    gadi12345 checks, Hero bets $15, gadi12345 calls $15

    Turn: ($51, 2 players)
    gadi12345 bets $24, Hero raises to $61.50, gadi12345 folds

    Final Pot: $136.50

    Hero wins $133.50 ( won +$48 )
    gadi12345 lost -$48.00


    33/0 over 21 hands. not history. not sure what exactly i should do with the hand since ive hit an ace but again shoving turn lead is goot.

    $1/$2 No Limit Holdem
    5 players
    Converted at weaktight.com

    Stacks:
    UTG zaino ($274.05)
    CO Lumpsucker ($148.05)
    BTN Hero ($196.00)
    SB ace662 ($240.55)
    BB trinoo ($348.17)

    Pre-flop: ($3, 5 players) Hero is BTN
    1 fold, Lumpsucker calls $2, Hero raises to $9, 2 folds, Lumpsucker calls $7

    Flop: ($21, 2 players)
    Lumpsucker bets $10.50, Hero raises to $28, Lumpsucker calls $17.50

    Turn: ($77, 2 players)
    Lumpsucker bets $38.50, Hero raises to $159, Lumpsucker folds

    Final Pot: $274.50

    Hero wins $271.50 ( won +$75.50 )
    Lumpsucker lost -$75.50
    Jman: every time the action is to you, it's an opportunity for you to make the perfect play.
  13. #13
    Bump for evidence. Villain is a 40/23/3 semi-donk but not quite as bad postflop as the numbers might suggest.

    Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

    Hero (CO) ($107.15)
    Button ($288.10)
    SB ($117.10)
    BB ($234.70)
    UTG ($160.50)
    MP ($113.55)

    Preflop: Hero is CO with 2, 2
    2 folds, Hero raises to $3, 2 folds, BB calls $2

    Flop: ($6.50) Q, 9, A (2 players)
    BB checks, Hero bets $5, BB calls $5

    Turn: ($16.50) A (2 players)
    BB bets $7, Hero raises to $19, 1 fold

    Total pot: $30.50 | Rake: $1.50

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •