Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
REGISTER
Subscribe to FTR web feed
Poker Forum › FTR Community ›

how accurate is pokertableratings

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. 02-06-2009 09:17 PM #1
    wufwugy
    wufwugy is offline
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    26,076

    Default how accurate is pokertableratings

    http://www.pokertableratings.com/

    it says my wr is half what it really is. would like to know how accurate it is for you guys. also if its inaccuracy is random or specific

    edit: also if anybody knows how long it dates back
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  2. 02-06-2009 09:23 PM #2
    swiggidy's Avatar
    swiggidy
    swiggidy is offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...
    It says my winrate is zero
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  3. 02-06-2009 09:26 PM #3
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    a500lbgorilla
    a500lbgorilla is offline SPLENDID GUY
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    you answered your own question?
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  4. 02-06-2009 09:27 PM #4
    kingnat's Avatar
    kingnat
    kingnat is offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    3,124
    I think it's randomly specific.
    So you click their picture and then you get their money?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  5. 02-06-2009 09:35 PM #5
    meeloche's Avatar
    meeloche
    meeloche is offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,056
    It probably gets like 60-70% of hands in general I think. It doesn't get any hands that I play starting tables super short handed. It may only get hands at full tables I'm not sure to be honest I haven't compared my hem to it.



    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  6. 02-06-2009 09:51 PM #6
    WildBobAA's Avatar
    WildBobAA
    WildBobAA is offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,701
    I believe on the website somewhere, it says that 75% of hands are tracked.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  7. 02-06-2009 10:14 PM #7
    kb coolman's Avatar
    kb coolman
    kb coolman is offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    863
    I remember a few weeks back seeing nutsinho listed as a top winner with about $160k for the day. He said he actually won closer to $250k, so it definately misses a lot.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  8. 02-06-2009 10:54 PM #8
    daven
    daven is offline trolling freetrollers
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up

    Default Re: how accurate is pokertableratings

    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    http://www.pokertableratings.com/

    it says my wr is half what it really is. would like to know how accurate it is for you guys. also if its inaccuracy is random or specific

    edit: also if anybody knows how long it dates back
    It is inaccurate on hands played since it started.
    Maybe getting more complete now? hard to tell - pm zwifti and ask how much he has won at 100nl on FT this year, that may tell you how close it is
    don't raise with the straight flush bro, nobody ever gonna call that shit
    allin, reload, repeat

    please read: http://www.philgalfond.com/lets-make-some-changes/
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  9. 02-07-2009 07:24 AM #9
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Miffed22001
    Miffed22001 is offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    ive 400k+ hands on stars - if i look up my SN on there it has me at 13k hands and -1k profit.

    very accurate IMO.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  10. 02-07-2009 07:32 AM #10
    bigspenda73's Avatar
    bigspenda73
    bigspenda73 is offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    13,459
    Location
    Pwnsylvania
    it only tracks 100nl+ and 2/4 limit and above and no PLO (boooo)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  11. 02-07-2009 08:06 AM #11
    badgers's Avatar
    badgers
    badgers is offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    4,395
    Location
    Spewing
    strarted at stars on september 1st
    3k post - Return of the blog!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  12. 02-07-2009 10:36 AM #12
    Alexos's Avatar
    Alexos
    Alexos is offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,247
    Location
    Montreal
    does it show bb/100 or ptbb/100... i dont even know whats the standard anymore
    Nine to five is how to survive - I ain't trying to survive / I'm trying to live it to the limit and love it a lot //

    Can offer RB deals on most sites, PM me.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  13. 02-07-2009 01:52 PM #13
    gabe's Avatar
    gabe
    gabe is offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    it seems like it gets almost all of my 6max hands but hardly any of my hands on HU tables
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  14. 02-07-2009 06:30 PM #14
    JinxT4's Avatar
    JinxT4
    JinxT4 is offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    430
    75-80% accurate or so.

    Quote Originally Posted by Alexos
    does it show bb/100 or ptbb/100... i dont even know whats the standard anymore
    Ptbb as far as I know.
    [04:18] <+Bbickes> do u has teh agoraphobia?
    [04:18] <+fat> im agressive yes
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  15. 02-07-2009 07:16 PM #15
    wufwugy
    wufwugy is offline
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    26,076
    does anybody know if there is any hand retrieval priority? what i mean by this is that perhaps it retrieves low bb pots, but not as many high bb pots. i wonder about this specifically because it has about 85% of my hands, yet like i said wr is about half what it really is. that would be one way of explaining the disparity.

    according to the site, accuracy is 95+%, ftp has been tracking since jan 08 and ps since sept 08, i think
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  16. 02-08-2009 01:17 AM #16
    kb coolman's Avatar
    kb coolman
    kb coolman is offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    863
    accurate or not, this is damn impressive:

    http://www.pokertableratings.com/ove...?site=fulltilt

    and this just cracks me up...why do people keep playing nose-bleed stakes? notice his 'worst enemy'

    http://www.pokertableratings.com/ove...mnl?site=stars
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  17. 02-08-2009 02:16 AM #17
    wufwugy
    wufwugy is offline
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    26,076
    yea its kinda neat, it seems the only players with good/great winrates are either the best of the best, like trex or jman, or the really good ones who play lowish stakes, like kelisitaan or drgiggy
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  18. 02-11-2009 12:27 PM #18
    BigPapi
    BigPapi is offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    559
    Location
    Rotterdam, Holland
    yeah definitely ptbb or BB /100

    UB is tracked since joining AP (mid december). i have around 60% of my hands tracked I think. 4.25 BB/100 according to this site, but only 7500 hands tracked. From HEM I know I have around 5.5-6BB at this moment on last 13k-ish hands (since december, small sample though).
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  19. 02-11-2009 03:41 PM #19
    Muzzard's Avatar
    Muzzard
    Muzzard is offline DO NOT STAKE/TRADE
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,315
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Quote Originally Posted by kb coolman
    accurate or not, this is damn impressive:

    http://www.pokertableratings.com/ove...?site=fulltilt

    and this just cracks me up...why do people keep playing nose-bleed stakes? notice his 'worst enemy'

    http://www.pokertableratings.com/ove...mnl?site=stars
    durrr=hold_emnl if u didnt know
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules