100NL, is TT good facing a big river bet?

[pokerfan]

villian is unknown but has 9/7/3 over 43 hands. Normally, i snap call this river bet and feel OK vs most players. I doubt he'd turn his made worse hand into bluff on such a dry board. Should i really trust my HUD over a small sample size ?
No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (9 handed) - Hold'em Manager Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

UTG ($100)
UTG+1 ($100)
MP1 ($100)
MP2 ($109.55)
MP3 ($64.70)
CO ($100)
Hero (Button) ($101.50)
SB ($103.40)
BB ($18.50)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 10, 10
1 fold, UTG+1 calls $1, MP1 bets $5, 3 folds, Hero calls $5, 2 folds, UTG+1 calls $4

Flop: ($16.50) 3, 3, 2 (3 players)
UTG+1 checks, MP1 checks, Hero bets $11, UTG+1 calls $11, 1 fold

Turn: ($38.50) Q (2 players)
UTG+1 checks, Hero checks

River: ($38.50) 9 (2 players)
UTG+1 bets $23, Hero ?

[badgers]

I think I probably call this but that may be a leak on my part. When a player with those stats l/cs utg it's probably a small PP a large amount, so I think he has to be randomly betting 44/55 here for a call to be good. His line is a bit weird though and he's mostly just repping 33/22 unless he's limp calling KK+. Given the action preflop I don't think this is KK+ very much at all so I can't fold this without some better reads. I lean more towards calling since we will egt some idea of how he plays and we can make better decisions against him in the future (I'm not saying call $23 for information but in a close spot the information gained by calling is worth adding into consideration.)

[grindinginnj]

I agree..^^

[oskar]

I think it's 44-88 a lot, but the sizing is weird. Either he typed it out or he pushed halfpot and then added 3bb... which is a bit scary. I might just snap fold this in the middle of a session tbh.