|
Can only beat a bluff on the river...
I used to always fold small pp from early position, but have recently been trying to raise any pp from any position to see how it goes, especially when I have a deeper stack. This hand I was wondering about.
Read: Villain was running 32/10 over 152 hands. I had seen him limp and cold call often with hands Q9s+, Kxs, Axs, 87s, small pp. He was cold-calling or limp-calling-a-raise 34% of the 77 times he had a chance. on the flop, he had called continuation bets on the flop 10/14 times. One that went to show down, he had a flush draw, the other time he had an over card and some backdoors.
I am wondering whether a blocking bet on the river is better than a check here (something like $10?), and then obviously folding to a raise. Perhaps my mistake was more on the bet-sizing on the previous streets?
Any comments, appreciated.
Dealt to Hero [2h 2s]
Hero: raises $2 to $3
skat tilt: folds
DarkAce77: folds
Pokeroli1984: folds
Villain: calls $3
nabbekeben: folds
sk_limx: folds
JP917: folds
*** FLOP *** [5h 5d 3c]
Hero: bets $5
Villain: calls $5
*** TURN *** [5h 5d 3c] [6h]
Hero: bets $10
Villain: calls $10
*** RIVER *** [5h 5d 3c 6h] [Ks]
Hero checks
Villain bets $18
Hero?
|