2nl, 6mx, 88, squeeze/shove?

[rong]

Stats:
SB: 47/33 over 30 hands
BB: 65/12 AFac 1 over 34 hands



PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.02 BB (6 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

MP ($3.42)
Hero (CO) ($4.32)
Button ($2)
SB ($1.06)
BB ($0.66)
UTG ($4)

Preflop: Hero is CO with ,
1 fold, MP calls $0.02, Hero bets $0.10, 1 fold, SB calls $0.09, BB raises to $0.18, 1 fold, Hero???

So the question I have is should I be shoving over the top here?

The argument for: SB only called, which implies weakness & is therefore likely to fold, also SB only has a further 48BBs so I'm not really getting my implied odds to setmine. BB has a further 24BBs behind, again no odds to setmine. 20BB in the pot, equity against even a tight range:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 39.374% 39.19% 00.19% 37574366 181057.00 { 8h8s }
Hand 1: 60.626% 60.44% 00.19% 57952544 181057.00 { JJ+, AQs+, AQo+ }

EV of a shove with above range always calling: +11.4bb

Am I missing anything here?

[PlayToWin]

If you are behind their range, how is shoving +ev?

[rong]

Dead chips

[PlayToWin]

Dead chips

I thought dead chips were chips that you could steal with a bet given that villians wouldn't defend. But you say above that villian is always calling the shove, so I don't get it.

[oskar]

EV of a shove with above range always calling: +11.4bb

no

How do you get to 11.4?

[rong]

ah yeah, woops, still positive though.

[Micro2Macro]

I thought dead chips were chips that you could steal with a bet given that villians wouldn't defend. But you say above that villian is always calling the shove, so I don't get it.

I think what OP means is there is overlay given the amount of money in the pot already which reduces the amount of equity he needs compared to if stacks were deeper to make going all in +EV