Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFull Ring NL Hold'em

slow-play good

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Default slow-play good

    You know, I hear everyone here saying over and over, "You have to slow play, that's the only way to make money." But here is an arguement against slow playing. Maybe you all will change your mind

    Seriously, I probably wouldn't have seen this flop except I just had a good win and I was feeling good. The suited cards made me limp in.

    Game #524992226 - (blinds $0.10/$0.25) No Limit Texas Hold'em -
    2004/06/19-15:57:05 (CST)
    Table "Virgin Isles" (real money) -- Seat 3 is the button
    Seat 2: Scottie Lass ($47.65 in chips)
    Seat 3: badgercorp ($20.30 in chips)
    Seat 4: thefatstacks ($14.65 in chips)
    Seat 5: bhall45 ($9.25 in chips)
    Seat 6: givemeur$$ ($12.05 in chips)
    Seat 7: jugbutt ($26.75 in chips)
    Seat 8: Humphrind ($28.30 in chips)
    Seat 9: chuck24seven ($21.90 in chips)
    Seat 10: Holysmokey ($4.20 in chips)
    thefatstacks: Post Small Blind ($0.10)
    bhall45 : Sit out
    givemeur$$: Post Big Blind ($0.25)
    Dealing...
    Dealt to Humphrind [ ]
    Dealt to Humphrind [ ]
    jugbutt : Call ($0.25)
    Humphrind: Call ($0.25)
    chuck24seven: Call ($0.25)
    Holysmokey: Call ($0.25)
    Scottie Lass: Call ($0.25)
    badgercorp: Call ($0.25)
    thefatstacks: Call ($0.15)
    givemeur$$: Check
    *** FLOP *** : [ ]
    thefatstacks: Check
    givemeur$$: Check
    jugbutt : Check
    Humphrind: Bet ($0.50)
    chuck24seven: Fold
    Holysmokey: Fold
    Scottie Lass: Fold
    badgercorp: Fold
    thefatstacks: Fold
    givemeur$$: Call ($0.50)
    jugbutt : Call ($0.50)
    *** TURN *** : [ ] [ ]
    givemeur$$: Check
    jugbutt : Check
    Humphrind: Bet ($1)
    givemeur$$: Raise ($2)
    jugbutt : Fold
    Humphrind: Call ($1)
    *** RIVER *** : [ ] [ ]
    givemeur$$: Bet ($4)
    Humphrind: Raise ($8)
    givemeur$$: Raise All-in ($5.30)
    Humphrind: Call ($1.30)
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Pot: $24.85 | Rake: $1.25
    Board: [ 5s 2c 5c 7h Jh ]
    Scottie Lass lost $0.25 (folded)
    badgercorp lost $0.25 (folded)
    thefatstacks lost $0.25 (folded)
    bhall45 didn't bet
    givemeur$$ lost $12.05 (showed hand) [ ] (a full house, fives full of
    twos)
    jugbutt lost $0.75 (folded)
    Humphrind bet $12.05, collected $24.85, net +$12.80 (showed hand) [ ] (a
    full house, fives full of jacks)
    chuck24seven lost $0.25 (folded)
    Holysmokey lost $0.25 (folded)
    I don't know what they have to say
    It makes no difference anyway.
    Whatever it is...
    I'm against it.
  2. #2
    I think that was just an unlucky situation for him. I doubt you would have folded if he went all in on the flop! It's hard to put someone on 22.

    PocketFives - allLiving
    Pokerstars - [595-ESCAPE]
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by allLiving
    I think that was just an unlucky situation for him. I doubt you would have folded if he went all in on the flop! It's hard to put someone on 22.
    Yes but post flop was his strongest point. He had the nuts post flop. I may not have folded, but it was so much easier to call his all in when, 1. He was talking about less money and 2. I had my full house made.
    I don't know what they have to say
    It makes no difference anyway.
    Whatever it is...
    I'm against it.
  4. #4
    Xianti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    9,246
    Location
    facebook.com/mediacookery
    There was nothing he could have done. Just a bad river card for the poor fellow. If I were him, I'd be pissed that you paid to play your junk hand.
  5. #5
    Yeah, suited Jacks and Queens don't play that well. I've caught several with the second best flush when I've had a suited Ace or King. Particularly from UTG+1...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •