|
Food for thought .....
Dare I say this, but have you ever thought about trying limit out for a while?
Before everyone jumps all over me and says that LHE and NLHE are drastically different games, or that NL is better than LHE for this or that reason (or vice-versa), let me preempt that by agreeing with that statement.
There are, however, definitely some trivial and not so trivial similarities to both games. For example, working on the all the various facets of pre-flop, flop, 4th and 5th street play are important elements of both games (some sub-concepts are common to both games, some less so, some are only really apply in one or the other) ... Adjusting to table conditions, table selection skills, adjusting and reading other players, working on your hand reading skills/reading the board, the psychology of patience and discipline, gaining a true appreciation for starting hand value and the value of position are all other common elements of both games.
I've said this before and I'll say it again ... look at the majority of the poker pros out there ... most of them play more than just one form of poker (LHE, NLHE, Razz, Omaha, 7CS etc, ring/cash games, tournaments, short-handed games etc.).... I think they do this for two primary reasons .... variety, and more importantly, to work on what we would probably all agree to be one of the truely important elements of great poker player, adaptability. The ability to be the Chameleon; the one who knows which tactics or strategies apply to a particular given sceanario. The one who can readily id when its time to change it up , the one who knows that its time to keep doing more of the same. Like we all keep saying for all things poker .... "it depends".
I too would like to become an accomplished NLHE player. However, the path I've decided to take is to try and become very good at LHE first, while sprinkling in the occasional foray into NL (mostly tournaments, home-games, and the occasional SNG for variety). This might not be the path you want to take, but I'm just throwing it out there as food-for-thought. This allows me to be exposed to both games so that I can begin to appreciate the subtle and not-so subtle differences and similarities, while limiting my downside risks. I think being able to understand the adjustments you have to make in each game and more importantly the underlying conceptual reasoning behind those adjustments are only going to make you a stronger, more knowledgable, all-round solid player in whatever game you eventually choose as your favourite.
My thinking behind my intial focus on LHE is that I want to be exposed to as much HE as possible during my development, but I also want to be prudent about it by limiting my downside risk. With LHE, the individual mistakes I make certainly won't cost me as much while I work on my game as they would if I was playing cash-game NL. Of course, this thinking also applies to fixed buy-in NL game structures too, like tournaments and SNGs. This allows me to continuely analyze and plug leaks etc. to improve my game, and by-the-way, also earn a decent amount of money while I'm doing it. (maybe not as much as some of the above-average NL players, but I bet my downsides aren't as big the average-to-below-average NL players')
I think both are truely, awesome challenging games and I personally would like to strive to master both. Attempting to become good at both is only going to make me a better all-round player. I'll consider really specializing in one or the other if and when I think I'm good enough to even begin attempt to acheive that lofty goal. But for now, I find myself most often, grinding away at the $4-8 tables offline, and $2-4 tables online. But, I have to say that I'm not very far away (I was so tempted just the other night actually) from taking my first $200 buy-in to the $3-6 blinds, $500 max buy-in NL cash game table at the local B&M just to see how I make out on my first real cash-NL-game "all-in".
|