|
I think that the original ruling 12 or 13 years ago, is that she does not want to be kept alive by artificial means. This ruling came about by her husband and 2 or 3 of her friends who recalled her saying while talking about someone in a similar cicumstance that she wouldn't want to be kept alive if she got like that.
So because it was ruled that this is what she wanted based on those witnesses testimony, all of the parent's appeals through the 19 courts and 10 judges have been actually appealing to override her daughters wishes, not the husbands. Even if her husband wanted her to be kept alive, he would have to purger himself by saying that he lied about what he testified his wife said.
I think it's just a couple of parents that don't want to let their daughter go. The hardest thing for any parent is having a child die. Hopefully, after she does pass away, I hope the parents do come to believe that it is what her daughter wanted.
|