|
|
Betting on the come from early position
Question for you all:
I've been thinking about a play I've had a lot lately that I wanted some general feedback:
- EP (e.g., UTG)
- s00ted A or K (nut or near nut draw) OR connectors
- Medium-sized party (3-5 callers) see a flop
- flop hits me to a 4-flush OR strong OESD (assume uncoordinated board with OESD)
Question: Do I bet out to build a pot, or wait for someone to bet so I can later ambush the field if I hit?
Here are examples of the tactics I employ here:
- If I check the flop, and EP/MP bets and several callers follow, I might c/r to build it at a calling table.
- If I check, and a raising war ignites, I will often begrudgingly fold.
- If I bet, and I get some callers and a late raise, I will over call to encourage MP callers behind me.
- If I bet, and I get raised right behind me, no matter the number of callers, I will just call to see a turn.
- If I bet and get a raise and re-raise behind me, I will overcall if I have near-pot odds (implied)
I've been in these situations alot lately, and often feel like I'm betting into a field blindly, when a medium sized field might check around, or build the pot for me. In this situation, I figure I have good pot equity to bet out with a medium field behind me. However, often times I ignite a raising war behind me, as people step up to fight the coordinated board. Then, I end up cold-calling to see a turn, sometimes with questionable odds ("Implied odds", I often say to myself). If I don't hit the turn, then I might again be faced with 2 bets to see a river depending on board texture. Clearly, implied odds come into play here, but this type of hand often seems to stoke my variance quite a bit.
So, I'm thinking that when I bet out on the flop, I'm often committing myself to see turn and river cards and I want to know if I should avoid doing so. Perhaps this is simply "Odds Calculation 101"? Thanks...
|