Can anyone rate some sites you have played on? Fishrate, blind/stack size and so on. Im mainly playing 1-tabel 10handed "normal speed" sngs at primapoker. Is there better sites?
|
01-07-2005 09:47 PM
#1
| |
| |
|
01-08-2005 12:56 AM
#2
| |
Same with about everything. If you want to improve your game and learn how to beat good players (and learn how to play more aggressively), play on Poker Stars. If you want to play against fish, which'll be more profitable on the short term but its not going to improve your play much against good players, play on Party. | |
|
01-08-2005 11:33 AM
#3
| |
I was on my way to make a deposit on Stars for a cuple of months ago, mainly for MTTs, but then a friend told me that there was to many good players there so I waited and made a Primapoker and a partpoker acc. I will probably try Stars soon! Whats the "start" stacksize and blinds on Stars? And how fast does there "normal" game dubbel blinds? | |
|
01-08-2005 12:56 PM
#4
| |
stack sizes are 1500, i'm not sure about the blinds but i know they go up slowly. | |
|
| |
|
01-09-2005 09:45 AM
#5
| |
|
Obertray
Guest
|
Blinds go up every 15 min in normal SNG and MTT, 5 min in turbos. |
|
01-13-2005 04:09 AM
#6
| |
![]()
|
I find that if you basically camp cards in party sngs you can probably crush them if you are a decent player. On stars turbos you have to play much more aggressively because the blinds rise so fast, and a lot of the time it ends up as a crapshoot with 2-3 players left. Stars normal sngs seem probably the best if you want to improve your game, because they nice starting stacks + small blinds allow you to rely on your game more to build your stack instead of sheer luck. |
|
01-13-2005 05:09 AM
#7
| |
The turbos are skill based too, but obviously require a lot more aggression. I prefer the turbos largely because they're less rock friendly and you'll get people to pay off your monsters a lot more. With the high buyin ones the players are still almost all pretty tight (about calling big bets, not neccesarily what cards they bet with), so stealing the bigger blinds, due to it being a turbo, is often very protifable as well. | |
|
01-13-2005 08:09 AM
#8
| |
![]()
|
Ya I definately agree there, I do real well in the turbo sngs until it becomes bubble time when the blinds are high, it just feels like a lot of the time it deteriorates into a crap shoot. |
|
01-13-2005 09:25 AM
#9
| |
|
Guest
|
|
|
01-14-2005 09:52 AM
#10
| |
|
Obertray
Guest
|
Ok ... Im an idiot |
|
01-14-2005 10:18 PM
#11
| |
You know what's interesting, is that I do significantly better at PokerStars SNGs than Party. Plus I do well at the only game I know with all good players, The FTR guantlet. So I am beginning to suspect that I play a better tourney vs. better players. They are more predictable. | |
|
01-17-2005 06:52 PM
#12
| |
I used to play SNGs solely at PartyPoker, but recently I've been having a lot more success at InterPoker. I think this is for a reason along the lines of what zenbitz was saying. The people at InterPoker have a lit bit more of an understanding of the game, and thus are much more predictable. But they're still weak and passive enough to beat. So I can still run them over but now I suffer fewer bad beats and am more confident in my reads. | |
|
01-17-2005 11:11 PM
#13
| |
Any comments on Pokerroom? I have been playing there exclusively , mainly in the MTT and freerolls, and have been improving my game and enjoying it. | |
|
01-17-2005 11:13 PM
#14
| |
| |
| |
|
01-18-2005 12:32 AM
#15
| |
![]()
|
I won the $500 freeroll at pokerroom a couple days of go. So it can be a good site but I prefer pokerstars |