|
For discussion... bet on the end or no?
***** Hand History for Game 1683353305 *****
$50 NL Hold'em - Friday, March 04, 11:25:24 EDT 2005
Table Table 37138 (Real Money)
Seat 4 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: stressball10 ( $86.25 )
Seat 2: azazelzed ( $57.7 )
Seat 4: smoothmaniac ( $48.05 )
Seat 5: Kozmo711 ( $54.1 )
Seat 6: STI320 ( $45.75 )
Seat 7: jhayjunior ( $29.63 )
Seat 8: pkrtommy ( $85.7 )
Seat 9: kietle ( $46.75 )
Seat 10: drunk2night ( $65.1 )
Seat 3: MattCL05 ( $25.25 )
Kozmo711 posts small blind [$0.25].
STI320 posts big blind [$0.5].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to stressball10 [ 9h Jh ]
jhayjunior folds.
pkrtommy calls [$0.5].
drunk2night calls [$0.5].
stressball10 calls [$0.5].
azazelzed folds.
MattCL05 folds.
smoothmaniac folds.
Kozmo711 folds.
STI320 checks.
** Dealing Flop ** [ Kd, Kh, 4s ]
STI320 checks.
pkrtommy checks.
drunk2night checks.
stressball10 checks.
** Dealing Turn ** [ Jc ]
STI320 checks.
pkrtommy checks.
drunk2night checks.
stressball10 checks.
** Dealing River ** [ 8h ]
STI320 checks.
pkrtommy checks.
drunk2night checks.
stressball10 checks.
My take on it was this: there's no reason to value bet here. I probably have the best hand, but if no one else has a king or jack I'm not likely to get called. If someone else does have a king I'll get raised and I'm just wasting a bet; if they have a jack I have potential kicker problems when they call. Is that correct? I feel like you almost always want to bet when you feel your hand is best, but in this situation I figured I stood to win exactly as much if my hand was best, and to save myself money if someone was slowplaying a good hand.
|