|
|
SNG numbers from pokertracker - opinions please
Ok, I know 5k hands isn't enough for these numbers to be solid yet, but I thought they're probably meaningful enough for useful comments/analysis to be made. I'm playing the $10, and recently $20 single table SNGs on empire.
These are my numbers averaged over all blind levels:
ROI 38.5%
VPIP 27.3% - looks about right to me
Saw flop 27.73% - Same here
Saw flop outside blinds 15.41% - Too tight ? Is it possible for this to be so far off a good average over this many hands (5k) and for it to just be statistical variance and not overtight play?
Aggression factor - PF 0.64, flop 3.21, turn 1.82, river 3.00
Average aggression factor 1.21 including pre-flop numbers
Average aggression factor 2.59 not including PF number
Aggression factor looks way way too low pre-flop to me, but I don't feel like I limp too much - again could this just be that the sample size is too small? The numbers for the flop, turn and river look ok to me.
Another thing that occured to me is that limping in as the BB or just completing the small blind might be counted in the call % calculation in pokertracker, if so the first few rounds in a SNG of rock-tight folding would have a high ratio of calls/limps to bets/raises. Does anyone know if this skewing is happening or if these cases are not counted in calculating the aggression factor numbers?
TylerDurden
|