|
I've played Party's 25 NL, 50 NL, 100 NL, and 200 NL 6-max. I'd say your descriptions of 25 and 50 are pretty accurate, though 50 was a bit looser when I played it. For me, 100 was more tight and people wouldnt chase as much as in lower stakes.
200 didn't seem a whole lot harder, players played very predictably (similar to 200 NL 10-max), folded when they should and called when they thought they had you. Very easy manipulated. Then again your talking to someone who is used to the unpredictable sharkfest of 3/6 NL 10-max on Party.
I am going to venture into 400 NL 6-max pretty soon, I hear its a lot harder though, I'll tell you what I think of it.
Being a 10-max player however, whenever I play 6-max (unless I've been playing 6-max for a whole day or two straight), I think of the hand in terms of 10-max, i.e. a 10-max game where the first four people have folded, which allows me to go back and forth very quickly and play well.
|