|
|
Confused about HoH2 Passage
There's a passage in Harrington on Hold 'em, Part 2 that I just don't understand. It's in the discussion of the Red Zone tactics on page 141:
"Here's a simple example of first-in vigorish in the Red Zone that's easily remembered:
1. If your M is exactly 3,
2. No one has entered the pot yet,
3. You think there's a 50 percent chance that your remaining opponents will fold to an all-in bet,
4. You're a 2-to-1 dog to win if you are called, then
5. You can move all-in with a positive expectation.
I call this the '3-to-1 Rule,' and it's very handy to remember when you're slogging through the Red Zone"
This passage seems to be missing a word. Does he mean "and" or "or" here? In some of his examples, some of these conditions are true, but not all of them. This is a typo of some kind, and I don't know how to interpret it.
|