PP 10+1. Stupid push.

[vqc]

***** Hand History for Game 2962041092 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $10 Buy-in + $1 Entry Fee Trny:17038586 Level:8 Blinds(200/400) - Monday, October 31, 23:03:43 EDT 2005
Table Table 71506 (Real Money)
Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 4
Seat 1: WestCoastCow ( $1430 )
Seat 3: IModFTR ( $930 )
Seat 5: florcher ( $790 )
Seat 6: Larrykings ( $4850 )
Trny:17038586 Level:8
Blinds(200/400)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to IModFTR [ 2h Th ]
WestCoastCow folds.
IModFTR is all-In [930]

UGH.

This push is -EV in all situations
But next hand Im pushing SO many hands that are worse then T2.

Wat do I do...

[gabe]

wait until next hand? at least then the big stack wont have the BB, and maybe a smallish stack busts this hand.

[vqc]

How often do you think the small stack busts this hand?
How often do you think he doubles up?
How often do you think he stays in without much change to his stack?

Do the second 2 chances outweigh the first one?
If it does, shouldnt I be pushing this hand becuase IM pushing even worse hands next?

[gabe]

t2s is worse than average, so on average your next hand will be better.

[vqc]

t2s is worse than average, so on average your next hand will be better.

gotcha.
thnx gabe.

it hought T2 would be better than avg against calling hands.

to hijack my own thread.
if you were going to be pushing HU would u rather have 96 or T2?
*im too lazy to run the numbers.

[DogOnMySide]

96o vs random:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 44.4913 % 42.10% 02.39% { 96o }
Hand 2: 55.5087 % 53.12% 02.39% { random }


T2o vs random:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 41.6684 % 39.24% 02.43% { T2o }
Hand 2: 58.3316 % 55.90% 02.43% { random }

[vqc]

but HU calling ranges are never random.
people favor certain hands over other hands.

[TLR]

Wait till the next hand, chances are the next hand is better