I'm short stacked, and UTG. I'm pretty much committed to going all in either this hand, or the next hand when I'm the BB.
What hands are not good enough to go all-in with here?
Ex: 5 handed, short stack 4XBB, I get dealt 67s UTG.
|
11-07-2005 10:45 AM
#1
| |
![]()
|
|
|
11-07-2005 11:27 AM
#2
| |
Suited connector is better then a random hand IMO. I'd push here. | |
|
11-07-2005 12:14 PM
#3
| |
I need more info... what are the stacks behind you? What's your read on your chances of getting them to fold? These aren't major factors when you're desperate for a double up, but they are factors. | |
|
| |
|
11-07-2005 12:16 PM
#4
| |
If you expect bb to insta call with any two, I'd fold. This usually happens when they have a bigger stack. Otherwise, I'm runnin with it. | |
|
| |
|
11-07-2005 02:11 PM
#5
| |
I'd push here, next hand you'll lose the ability to be first one in the pot so anyone who is in will call you. If you push here you have 4xBB so any random hands aren't going to auto call you (unless it gets folded to the BB which he should call you with anything), plus if they call, the have to worry about being reraised behind them. Example: if you push and I'm next to act with AT or even AJ i'm gonna fold because if I want to isolate I'm going to have to raise and commit a lot of chips with these hands and if someone wakes up with a big hand behind me they'll just push over the top and I'll have to fold. | |
|
11-07-2005 03:11 PM
#6
| |
![]()
|
I prefer 96s here over K5. |
|
11-07-2005 04:01 PM
#7
| |
| |
|
| |
|
11-07-2005 06:32 PM
#8
| |
I like 67s better than 96s or K5o. | |