What is super-aggressive or loose?

[silverfist]

I'd like to loosen up my hand requirements a little, and I realised that if I can ignore the people who enter most pots, I'll have a lot more hand options (I follow Harrington's method). There are a lot of people who limp into every pot, and a lot of people who raise constantly, especially on the bubble. For ignoring people, I thought the following numbers could be used (I have Poker Tracker, and it gives me some of these numbers).

Limpers: Ignore anyone who voluntarily puts money into 60%+ pots
Raisers: Ignore anyone who raises 30% + pots (actually, reraise them).

How do these numbers sound? I'd like to get a little more aggressive out there, but don't want to walk into any traps.

[aislephive]

Limpers and habitual raisers present some problems. In my last SNG the big stack limped into every other pot and called a lot of raises, and he spoiled some of my steals because I would have to get through him to be successful. Limpers can have nearly anything and you never know if a flop hit them or not. The problem with the players who raise raise raise, they can wake up with a hand too. If you reraise them they might have the goods or not, and if you're wrong you're out of the tournament. I tend to stay away from the big stack without a hand. The fact is that they can bust you, and if you guess incorrectly then that's it. When you get a hand, though, drop the hammer.

[Scuba Chuck]

How do these numbers sound? I'd like to get a little more aggressive out there, but don't want to walk into any traps.

I've got a better idea. How about playing either:

A) more tables
B) higher stakes