I'm not sure why the others saw the bluff so easily without a read. For me it was a purely read-based call (since I induced the bluff anyway).
01-11-2006 06:34 PM
#13
| |
![]() ![]()
|
I'm not sure why the others saw the bluff so easily without a read. For me it was a purely read-based call (since I induced the bluff anyway). |