Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumTournament Poker

Would you play this AKc differently?

Results 1 to 29 of 29
  1. #1

    Default Would you play this AKc differently?

    ***** Hand History for Game 3315729566 *****
    NL Texas Hold'em $10 Buy-in + $1 Entry Fee Trny:18900517 Level:2 Blinds(15/30) - Wednesday, January 04, 20:08:13 EDT 2006
    Table Table 68007 (Real Money)
    Seat 6 is the button
    Total number of players : 9
    Seat 8: htrips ( $565 )
    Seat 10: Nashorn ( $775 )
    Seat 1: PokerSword ( $1230 )
    Seat 5: sKaucyboy ( $870 )
    Seat 6: FORDMAN89 ( $1735 )
    Seat 7: MrDragon999 ( $710 )
    Seat 4: Sir_W ( $505 )
    Seat 3: QwkDrawMkGra ( $470 )
    Seat 9: johnnyBuz ( $1140 )
    Trny:18900517 Level:2
    Blinds(15/30)
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to johnnyBuz [ Kc Ac ]
    >You have options at Table 67718 Table!.
    johnnyBuz calls [30].
    Nashorn folds.
    PokerSword folds.
    QwkDrawMkGra folds.
    Sir_W raises [85].
    sKaucyboy folds.
    FORDMAN89 folds.
    MrDragon999 folds.
    htrips folds.
    johnnyBuz calls [55].
    ** Dealing Flop ** [ Ah, 2h, 4d ]
    >You have options at Table 67718 Table!.
    johnnyBuz bets [215].
    Sir_W calls [215].
    ** Dealing Turn ** [ Jc ]
    johnnyBuz bets [205].
    Sir_W is all-In [205]
    ** Dealing River ** [ Qd ]
    Liter of cola.
  2. #2
    konahead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    929
    Location
    san fernando valley
    Re-raise opp all-in preflop. Bet exactly the amount he has in his stack. - looks scarier than a push. (I would have raised to 100 preflop before it even got to him...)
  3. #3
    The reason I'm asking is, here were the results.

    ************* SPOILER BELOW **************
    DON'T READ IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE THE RESULTS YET





















    johnnyBuz shows [ Ac, Kc ] a pair of aces.
    Sir_W is all-In shows [ As, Ad ] three of a kind, aces.
    Sir_W is all-In wins 1055 chips from the main pot with three of a kind, aces.
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Liter of cola.
  4. #4
    Raise AKs from UTG. Assuming the BB has neither an A nor K and does not have a pair, he still has a 33% chance of beating AKs by the River. Why give the BB a 33% chance to beat you without making him pay something for the privilege?

    Also, if someone else at the table has a real monster, they may well re-raise you hard. That is your chance to lay your AKs down to a hand that dominates you.

    But when you limp, get 2x raised and then call you have no idea where you stand. Does he have AQ and did not want people to see a cheap flop (you are ahead)? Does he have AK and does not want to let a premium hand go to flop without some money in the pot (you are roughly tied)? Does he have a pair of Jacks (coin flip)? Does he have a pair of Aces (you are way behind)? Any of those are possibilities, but you are ahead of some and behind on others. Now the flop comes and you have TPTK. TPTK is a fine hand, but it is not a license to print cash. You are out of position and you have no idea if you are ahead or behind.

    Plus . . .

    Your cards are suited and connected, having a multi-way pot is not a terrible thing. But you limped and someone re-raised. Consider the 4 people left to act. They are looking at a UTG limper (danger, danger) who will now get a chance to re-raise AFTER they act. That is a scary thing. Suddenly a lot of people stop putting money into the pot with just the types of hands that you would rather see them call.

    Looking now at the results, your opponent used his re-raise to get positional isolation. He has a dominating hand, he is last to act and you have a second best hand but no good idea where you stand.

    Consider if you had raised.

    1) He may have smooth called and the hand would probably have ended about the same.
    2) But with 4 people left to act, I think, more often then not, he would re-raise.
    a) If he is a tight player, you could see that he has re-raised a UTG raiser. He has a premium hand and you would do well to fold.
    b) If he is loose you could call the raise and play the flop.
    c) If he is loose you could re-raise.
    c1) If he comes way over the top, you can say 'nice Aces' and fold.
    c2) If he smooth calls, the hand will likely end as it did.

    None of these options are any worse that what happend, and a couple of them are much better.

    Raise AKs from UTG.
    Pyroxene
  5. #5
    samsonite2100's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,098
    Location
    Your loosing, lolololololololololol
    Great post, Pyroxene.
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by samsonite2100
    Great post, Pyroxene.
    Liter of cola.
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Pyroxene
    Raise AKs from UTG. Assuming the BB has neither an A nor K and does not have a pair, he still has a 33% chance of beating AKs by the River. Why give the BB a 33% chance to beat you without making him pay something for the privilege?
    Great point, but don't you think this is something players would only do/think about at the higher levels? I feel that $10+1 SnG's at PartyPoker have a wide range of fish, decent players, and pretty solid players. Most of the fish would just call the extra anyway if it is not too much, and in an 800 chip $15/30 blind, how much do I really want to risk with AKs, assuming 50% chance I don't even hit the flop.

    On a side note, this brings up an interesting question, is learning to play and win successfully at PartyPoker a hinderance to your overall game? If you can beat the "system," you are not actually getting better at poker correct?

    Should I be playing elsewhere, or at higher limits to really start getting better? I feel like it's a Catch 22, if I play at the low limits, I get sucked out alot more often and bad beats; but I don't have the bankroll to play at the higher limits, and it is probably also harder there anyway.
    Liter of cola.
  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by johnnyBuz
    Quote Originally Posted by Pyroxene
    Raise AKs from UTG. Assuming the BB has neither an A nor K and does not have a pair, he still has a 33% chance of beating AKs by the River. Why give the BB a 33% chance to beat you without making him pay something for the privilege?
    Great point, but don't you think this is something players would only do/think about at the higher levels? I feel that $10+1 SnG's at PartyPoker have a wide range of fish, decent players, and pretty solid players.

    On a side note, this brings up an interesting question, is learning to play and win successfully at PartyPoker a hinderance to your overall game? If you can beat the "system," you are not actually getting better at poker correct?

    Should I be playing elsewhere, or at higher limits to really start getting better? I feel like it's a Catch 22, if I play at the low limits, I get sucked out alot more often and bad beats; but I don't have the bankroll to play at the higher limits, and it is probably also harder there anyway.
    There are no solid players at the 11s. (I play at the 11s =D )

    It IS possible to get good at poker playing the PP tournies, I kno of at least one who did.

    I kno iv havnt been the nicest guy to u, so dont take this the wrong way, but you shouldnt be playing at anything higher than the 11s. If anything go play the 6+.5 Turbos at stars.
  9. #9
    I pretty much blow at poker so take that into account... but I'd like to echo vqc... for the health of the forum.

    I really enjoy this site and I understand and appreciate the push towards being more helpful and less harsh to new posters and novice players, but you need to be honest with yourself: You are playing bad poker.

    If you want assistance from this forum on improving your play significantly, you need to post a hand history of one of your sit n' gos. Delete every hand that you folded except the cards that you held, and leave everything else. When you provide little glimpses of your play on pre-filtered hands it's impossible to see some of your potential leaks (which I'm sure there are many). I'm not going to lie to you it's going to sting. But from most everything you've shown so far you are currently playing losing poker.

    Hopefully you've learned a few things from the non-'bad beat' hands you've posted, but this thread looks like a "How would you play this?... I GOT BAD BEAT DAMMIT!!!"-type of post that is not productive.

    Quote Originally Posted by johnnyBuz
    Should I be playing elsewhere, or at higher limits to really start getting better? I feel like it's a Catch 22, if I play at the low limits, I get sucked out alot more often and bad beats; but I don't have the bankroll to play at the higher limits, and it is probably also harder there anyway.
    This just kind of puts the exclamation point on the whole thing... If you can't emotionally deal with bad beats and suckouts, you will be a losing poker player.

    If you need some inspiration, I would suggest reading the foll0wing from dnuts' blog:
    http://blog.flopturnriver.com/post/D...272/Discipline
    So you click their picture and then you get their money?
  10. #10
    Great point, but don't you think this is something players would only do/think about at the higher levels? I feel that $10+1 SnG's at PartyPoker have a wide range of fish, decent players, and pretty solid players. Most of the fish would just call the extra anyway if it is not too much, and in an 800 chip $15/30 blind, how much do I really want to risk with AKs, assuming 50% chance I don't even hit the flop.
    This is EXACTLY why you need to raise pre-flop with your hand from UTG. As Pyroxene stated you absolutely have to define where you stand in the hand. Additionally, you want to put the donks at the table into a position where they are making bad decisions.

    In most cases, with the hand you have and the flop, if you raise pre-flop and put in a 3/4 sized bet at the flop you will take the pot down and some of the Donks' chips. Naturally, you will come across either a monster hand or some idiot who still calls you down and catches a miracle card to beat you, but that's poker.

    When I first started playing I too played passively because I didn't want to take the bad beat for all of my chips, however I have since reversed that strategy. Now, when I get in a pot I play it fairly aggressively and have seen a remarkable improvement in being able to lay down hands where I know I was behind and take hands from idiots who don't know how to play.

    If you want assistance from this forum on improving your play significantly, you need to post a hand history of one of your sit n' gos. Delete every hand that you folded except the cards that you held, and leave everything else. When you provide little glimpses of your play on pre-filtered hands it's impossible to see some of your potential leaks (which I'm sure there are many). I'm not going to lie to you it's going to sting. But from most everything you've shown so far you are currently playing losing poker.
    This is EXCELLENT advice. I did this when I first started posting here (which wasn't that long ago) and could not believe how many mistakes I was making that I couldn't see. My game took a quantum leap upwards just from that single post. You MUST, however, be willing to look at your play objectively. There have been posters who try to "justify" their bad moves instead of truly analyzing their play. Don't fall into that trap.

    Good Luck!!!
    Poker is easy, it's winning at poker that's hard.
  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by johnnyBuz
    Quote Originally Posted by Pyroxene
    Raise AKs from UTG. Assuming the BB has neither an A nor K and does not have a pair, he still has a 33% chance of beating AKs by the River. Why give the BB a 33% chance to beat you without making him pay something for the privilege?
    Great point, but don't you think this is something players would only do/think about at the higher levels? I feel that $10+1 SnG's at PartyPoker have a wide range of fish, decent players, and pretty solid players. Most of the fish would just call the extra anyway if it is not too much, and in an 800 chip $15/30 blind, how much do I really want to risk with AKs, assuming 50% chance I don't even hit the flop.

    On a side note, this brings up an interesting question, is learning to play and win successfully at PartyPoker a hinderance to your overall game? If you can beat the "system," you are not actually getting better at poker correct?

    Should I be playing elsewhere, or at higher limits to really start getting better? I feel like it's a Catch 22, if I play at the low limits, I get sucked out alot more often and bad beats; but I don't have the bankroll to play at the higher limits, and it is probably also harder there anyway.
    I am not God's gift to poker. But I play the $11 at PP and I certainly consider this. And I make a fair amount of money off the play. First off, if I am opening the pot then I treat AA/KK and AKs the same for raises. I also will randomly treat JJ/QQ/AK and even AQos the same though not always. So, my UTG raise says, "Hey guys, I most likely have AA, KK, or AKs; but I may have less. Anyone want in?" My big raise gets called. And the flop comes disconnected garbage. Out comes my 1/2 - 3/4 pot bet (assuming only one caller). That initial bet says, "Woohoo, looks like my AA/KK is still way good, anyone want in?" WAY more often then not, they fold and I win the money from their initial call of my preflop raise. If they call or raise, then I have so play the turn with care.

    Consider your hand, AKs. Who do you REALLY want to call you?

    You want ONE person with AQ, AJ, A-rag/K-rag (donks). You have them dominated. You have a 75% chance of winning at showdown. 3:1 is damn good odds pre-flop. Some people have a twisted hope that they will have 6:1 or 7:1. That is not going to happen with anything but Aces. Heck, KK is less than a 2:1 favorite against A-rag.

    You want QQ and JJ to call you. Because if you hit TPTK you can often get them to bet a fair amount; those hands are hard to let go for some and if you miss the flop you can get away from your hand.

    Who do you REALLY not want to call?

    You do not want small pocket pairs to call you. Because if they hit their set you will usually pay them a lot of money and if they miss their set they will dance away from the flop and pay you nothing more than the pre-flop bet.

    You do not want a lot of callers unless you are disciplined enough to treat AKs as a flush/straight drawing hand and be willing to ditch it to any show of strength if you only get TPTK.

    How do you encourage small pocket pairs NOT call you? You put in a big raise. Unless a player can really read their opponents well (I cannot), small pocket pairs need to hit the set on the flop to be worth anything. I will certainly call reasonable bets if I have pot odds on strange flops, like holding pocket 4s and the flop comes 2 3 5 rainbow. But, for the most part, no set - no bet. The set will come on the flop roughly 1 in 8 times (it will not win all of those times either, remember that.) Consequently, a player has to be able to make AT LEAST 8 times the pre-flop bet when they hit their set to make small pockets profitable. So, to eliminate small pocket pairs, you have to raise enough that it is unlikely they will be able to get 8 times that amount if they win. What you absolutely DO NOT want to do is limp in early with AKs, giving odds for the next guy with 99 to call, which gives odds to the next guy with 65s to call which gives odds for the button with 44 to call. Because, if you do, all kinds of boards start being a disaster; what's worse, some of those disaster boards even look good for you (ex. A K 4 rainbow). If you raise enough that pocket 4s cannot be played profitably, then you can feel good about that A K 4 flop. But if you limped in, out of position, and got a lot of callers, you are going to have to pay a lot of money to find out that you are behind.

    How do you discourage multi-way pots? You put in a big raise. Any hand can win. But, preflop, the better hand is more likely to win. So the better hand raises WHILE THEY ARE AHEAD. If others want to play slop, fine, you are getting the money in the pot when you have a 66% (vs QJ) or a 75% (vs Ax/Kx) chance of winning. AK will win UNIMPROVED against ONE other opponent a fair amount of the time. But, against 3 or more limpers, unimproved AKs is not worth much.

    There are lots of times to be tricky. But, as a general rule, raise when you have good reason to believe you are ahead or when you have good reason to believe you can make others think you are ahead (the 44 is actually ahead of you slightly but a big raise will make him question that because 44 is WAY behind a lot of hands that put in a big pre-flop raise.)

    Limping in with strong hands that do not TEND to to turn into monsters is just a good way to win a small pot or lose a big one. AKs MAY hit a flush, and it MAY hit a straight and it MAY hit a full house. But, on the whole, it USUALLY only hits TPTK. Limping in with it is asking to be called by a bunch of crap hands that either hit two pair or more (and you wind up paying them money), or they turn into nothing and get folded to your post-flop raise (and you wind up winning only the pre-flop pot).

    And that has nothing to do with your opponents being great players. It does not take a great player to call a big post-flop raise when they have middle set; hell, anyone can do it.
    Pyroxene
  12. #12
    konahead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    929
    Location
    san fernando valley
    damn, Pyroxene, well put. Very nice post.
  13. #13
    Pyroxene, after staring at a computer screen for the last 8 hours at work, I have to say that that is the best thing I've had to read all day. Excellent post. I plan to read it again when I get home.
    I think one of the interesting things about poker is that once you let your ego in, you're done for. ~ Al Alvarez
  14. #14
    the cunts I play against don't fold 66 or 55 anyway.

    (I ended up folding QQ preflop yesterday when UTG raises 8XBB on the second hand of the tourney; player in front doubles his bet, I call, and the BB doubles that. UTG pushed, the first reraiser and I folded and the BB called. It ended up an all-in preflop AJ vs. 55 and a queen came on the flop.)
  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by shooter
    Pyroxene, after staring at a computer screen for the last 8 hours at work, I have to say that that is the best thing I've had to read all day. Excellent post. I plan to read it again when I get home.
    I plan on reading this thead another 10 times.
    Liter of cola.
  16. #16
    samsonite2100's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,098
    Location
    Your loosing, lolololololololololol
    Not to kiss your ass too much, Pyroxene, but that was really an outstanding post--more clearly lays out the rationale for strong PF AK raising than anything I've read before.
  17. #17
    It was a great post but I firmly believe in mixing up how you play AK.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  18. #18
    konahead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    929
    Location
    san fernando valley
    someone send it to vqc so he quits limping AK..... (just kidding w you)
  19. #19
    Sticky worthy Pyroxene. nh sir.
  20. #20
    Back to the hand though, is there any way to really know in this situation that you are up against AA?
    Liter of cola.
  21. #21
    sometimes you just have to pay it off
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  22. #22
    The reason to LIMP AK really has to do with the depth of the stacks. I.e., on party 800 chippers say level 1, 15/20 blinds.

    Options:
    You raise 160: This is 1/5 of your stack. You get 0 or 1 caller, and the 1 probably has a very good hand - 99 or better. It's another 1/5th of your stack to c-bet a flop you missed. Or you get zero callers and won 35 chips with the 3rd best hand. If the blinds are bigger, this is great, but at lvl 1/2 it's worth spit.

    You raise 60-80: This is only 10% of your stack (!!), but you probably get 2-3 even 4 callers. 2 is OK, especially if the pot is only like 200. But if you bet the 1/2 pot that's another 1/8th of your stack! If 4 people call your raise of 80 chips, pot is 400 chips! You can't c-bet into 4 people, and you are pushing TPTK (assuming you hit).

    You limp (3% of your stack). You get a bunch of callers. You miss. You check/fold.
    If you hit TPTK... you may end up paying of a set, but you rake the bucks from A7, A9, AJ.

    There is a time and place for both limping and raising AK. Deception (i.e, I play AK/AA/KK the same) is kinda overrated in an SNG. You will be lucky to get each of these hands once... so can't really establish a pattern. MTT totally different.
  23. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by johnnyBuz
    Back to the hand though, is there any way to really know in this situation that you are up against AA?
    This is the second level of the SnG. You have seen 10 to 19 hands. He is the next to smallest stack at the table.

    How did he get that way? Has he played one hand, bet when he was ahead only to get sucked out on? Has he limped in every hand and chased? Has in raised a number of pots only to fold to later aggression or lose on the river showing down crap?

    Do you have notes on him from earlier times you played him?

    There is no way for us to know that he has AA because this hand sits in a vacuum for us. But, to you, the hand has context. If this is only the second hand that he has played and the first hand was him betting heavy with KK, only to lose to A-rag; an Ace falling on the flop and he played it conservatively then you can say it is likely he is a tight player and has a good hand. If he got down to $505 in 10-19 hands by raising with 6 hands, winning 2 with crap and losing the other 4 with worse crap then I am pushing All-In over the top of him with my AKs and saying 'nh' when he flips Aces.
    Pyroxene
  24. #24
    The only way you don't pay him off here is if you make it 90 pre and he pushes over. Then I think you may find a fold preflop. Once the flop comes, you are betting it, betting the turn and ai on the river if you aren't there already (opp. only had 500 stack).
  25. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by konahead
    someone send it to vqc so he quits limping AK..... (just kidding w you)
    never!!!!!
  26. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Pyroxene
    Quote Originally Posted by johnnyBuz
    Back to the hand though, is there any way to really know in this situation that you are up against AA?
    This is the second level of the SnG. You have seen 10 to 19 hands. He is the next to smallest stack at the table.

    How did he get that way? Has he played one hand, bet when he was ahead only to get sucked out on? Has he limped in every hand and chased? Has in raised a number of pots only to fold to later aggression or lose on the river showing down crap?

    Do you have notes on him from earlier times you played him?

    There is no way for us to know that he has AA because this hand sits in a vacuum for us. But, to you, the hand has context. If this is only the second hand that he has played and the first hand was him betting heavy with KK, only to lose to A-rag; an Ace falling on the flop and he played it conservatively then you can say it is likely he is a tight player and has a good hand. If he got down to $505 in 10-19 hands by raising with 6 hands, winning 2 with crap and losing the other 4 with worse crap then I am pushing All-In over the top of him with my AKs and saying 'nh' when he flips Aces.
    Good point. Sometimes I don't really pay as much attention as I should, and I'm not really getting good reads on everybody at the table. Sometimes, the play moves too fast and people catch cards that it's hard to put an accurate read on a player's skill level.

    But this is definitely something I need to start doing better.
    Liter of cola.
  27. #27
    Blinky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    514
    Location
    nutpeddlers anonymous
    You're getting a lot of milage for your money Buz.

    Regarding paying attention: I believe nobody has said this yet, but I would heartily discourage any multitabling at present time. Sure it's slower but you can put more energy into making reads and making the right decision(s).

    Only multi if you feel you have sufficient skill to make up for the lost quality with the increased volume. If you're currently a losing player, multitabling costs you in quality of play and simply helps you lose more money faster.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rondavu
    We will not support your pocket pair aggression.
  28. #28
    Reponse before reading the post:
    I've never had good success limping AK UTG (or ever for that matter) so I like to put a standard raise out there every time I get it - make it 100 PF before the raiser gets to you.

    When you get called by the short stack, you pretty much need to put him all-in on the flop. Take control of the hand and don't leave things up to him.

    If he pushed over your raise (UTG raises are usually well-respected) he might have a monster, now it's up to you and your feel.

    Feelings after reading the post:

    Great reasoning Pyroxene, great discussion.

    OP - I don't think you were going to get away from this hand unless he made it more than clear by being a tight player, but he's low and he's getting despearate. NH for him to catch in that situation, it could easily have been AQ or AJ and he probably would have played it the same; no way for you to know for sure every time.
  29. #29
    AK in late position with few customers is a very strong hand, but early you HAVE to raise with it, to drive out undercards. AK plays best and most profitably, I feel, when you hit TPTK with 3 players and a Q or J + rag also on board, and a decent pot to go with, but it's value decreases multi-way, in only the fact that your best case scenario against five people if you don't hit your A or K is a gut-shot draw with overcards.

    Raise to isolate.
    Operation Learn to Read
    Reads: 7 posted
    Money: $31
    SNGs: 0
    MTTs: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •