Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumTournament Poker

AKs hand ($10 SnG)

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Default AKs hand ($10 SnG)

    Seat 1: Phoenix2 x ($943 in chips)
    Seat 2: gordonbrody ($725 in chips)
    Seat 3: im nogenius [AC,KC] ($1,380 in chips)
    Seat 5: Spliffire ($3,192 in chips)
    Seat 6: CC46 ($515 in chips)
    Seat 7: rvanguelp ($1,230 in chips)
    Seat 8: xACTNOWx ($3,560 in chips)
    Seat 9: Potomophobic ($1,280 in chips)
    Seat 10: heh ($2,175 in chips)
    ANTES/BLINDS
    Phoenix2 x posts blind ($50), gordonbrody posts blind ($100).

    PRE-FLOP
    im nogenius bets $275, Spliffire folds, CC46 bets $515 and is all-in, rvanguelp bets $1,230 and is all-in, xACTNOWx folds, Potomophobic folds, heh folds, Phoenix2 x folds, gordonbrody folds, im nogenius ???

    ---

    rvanguelp was average in tightness.

    What do you do here?
  2. #2
    I would put them on a big pp. However, your raise of 275 was a little weak UTG and may have made people think that you don't have that good of a hand. Tough call but I would fold depending upon any reads that I had of rv.
  3. #3
    konahead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    929
    Location
    san fernando valley
    well, short-stack push doesn't mean a whole lot, and rvanguelp probably knows that - thats why he pushed. I doubt either one has AA/KK. I'd push back, but i'm willing to gamble in this spot. hey - they're suited!

    I'd put CC46 on AK/AQ and rvanguelp on TT-QQ (or maybe visa versa). If you don't want a cointoss and would rather ensure ITM, fold. me - I'll play this. (Note that if it was the WSOP, I'd fold, but in a lower-level on-line sng, count me in. Online, enough weaker hands do this to make it +EV, and the prize is a lot lower anyway....)

    edit - actually, if either one has AK/AQ, you've lost a bunch of outs - it's a lot closer to a fold than I first thought. I think a fold is actually appropriate here. (sorry - still working on my first cup of coffee - lol)
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by konahead
    well, short-stack push doesn't mean a whole lot, and rvanguelp probably knows that - thats why he pushed. I doubt either one has AA/KK. I'd push back, but i'm willing to gamble in this spot. hey - they're suited!

    I'd put CC46 on AK/AQ and rvanguelp on TT-QQ (or maybe visa versa). If you don't want a cointoss and would rather ensure ITM, fold. me - I'll play this. (Note that if it was the WSOP, I'd fold, but in a lower-level on-line sng, count me in. Online, enough weaker hands do this to make it +EV, and the prize is a lot lower anyway....)

    edit - actually, if either one has AK/AQ, you've lost a bunch of outs - it's a lot closer to a fold than I first thought. I think a fold is actually appropriate here. (sorry - still working on my first cup of coffee - lol)
    Being suited made me think all in as well at first. I agree though that if this a cheapy SNG then I'm in there. Like I said it depends if you have any reads. Oh, and if you would have raised it up a little bit more you could have had a better idea. I would have raised it the amount of the short stack.
  5. #5

    Default Re: AKs hand ($10 SnG)

    Quote Originally Posted by nogenius
    Seat 1: Phoenix2 x ($943 in chips)
    Seat 2: gordonbrody ($725 in chips)
    Seat 3: im nogenius [AC,KC] ($1,380 in chips)
    Seat 5: Spliffire ($3,192 in chips)
    Seat 6: CC46 ($515 in chips)
    Seat 7: rvanguelp ($1,230 in chips)
    Seat 8: xACTNOWx ($3,560 in chips)
    Seat 9: Potomophobic ($1,280 in chips)
    Seat 10: heh ($2,175 in chips)
    ANTES/BLINDS
    Phoenix2 x posts blind ($50), gordonbrody posts blind ($100).

    PRE-FLOP
    im nogenius bets $275, Spliffire folds, CC46 bets $515 and is all-in, rvanguelp bets $1,230 and is all-in, xACTNOWx folds, Potomophobic folds, heh folds, Phoenix2 x folds, gordonbrody folds, im nogenius ???

    ---

    rvanguelp was average in tightness.

    What do you do here?
    I fold and I think ur PFR is fine.
  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,043
    Location
    Drinking your milkshake.
    vqc is always the voice of reason
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Mac
    vqc is always the voice of reason
    thats wat i (dont) get paid for. =D
  8. #8
    Folding here isn't bad. I lean towards calling because these SNGs are a bitch to play at high blinds short stacked with 8-9 people still in. Short stack's hand is irrelvant (although he might triple up here). Big stack could have a hand as bad as 77 - but is still a flip+ against you - better if shorty has an A (highly likely).

    Best case:
    AK vs KQ vs KQ... (70%! equity)

    2nd best:
    AK vs 2 lower pairs... (40% equity)

    And gets worse from there.

    AK vs AA AK or something.
    Of course, it depends which player (short or tall) stack has the better hand...

    I think this is a pot odds call based on what you already stuck in there - plus only 1 guy can cripple you.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •