|
|
Do you ever want to call...
... just because the bet doesn't make sense?
Stage #306000602 Tourney ID 215964 Holdem Single Tournament No Limit $15 - 2006-01-25 15:31:03 (ET)
Table: 5439214 (Real Money) Seat #6 is the dealer
Seat 1 - SUZ0927 ($920 in chips)
Seat 2 - KEH10 ($1450 in chips)
Seat 3 - PAPAGENIUS ($1865 in chips)
Seat 4 - BEESBAITS ($1835 in chips)
Seat 5 - CHILLY 313 ($1125 in chips)
Seat 6 - SAKATTACK ($2210 in chips)
Seat 7 - TELECA ($2325 in chips)
Seat 8 - FORTUNE500 ($1540 in chips)
Seat 9 - JACKSON HOLE ($230 in chips)
TELECA - Posts small blind $15
FORTUNE500 - Posts big blind $30
*** POCKET CARDS ***
Dealt to FORTUNE500 [Kc 9h]
JACKSON HOLE - Folds
SUZ0927 - Calls $30
KEH10 - Folds
PAPAGENIUS - Folds
BEESBAITS - Folds
CHILLY 313 - Folds
SAKATTACK - Folds
TELECA - Calls $15
FORTUNE500 - Checks
*** FLOP *** [Ac 5d 4h]
TELECA - Checks
FORTUNE500 - Checks
SUZ0927 - Checks
*** TURN *** [Ac 5d 4h] [10c]
TELECA - Checks
FORTUNE500 - Checks
SUZ0927 - Checks
*** RIVER *** [Ac 5d 4h 10c] [Ks]
TELECA - Checks
FORTUNE500 - Bets $60
SUZ0927 - All-In(Raise) $890 to $890
TELECA - Folds
FORTUNE500 -???
I know it would be a horrendous call, but did they really walk an ace all the way down? I can't believe there's a flopped straight out there given the position. I suppose the logic is consistent with a set, but would a set really shove here? Wouldn't a value raise be more consistent? Raggy two pair is possible.
I don't know why I posted this, other than the fact that the hand smells fishy. I REALLY wanted to call this... but I didn't have the sack.
|