Whats your finishing %?

[bluey]

1 - 17.25%
2 - 13.38
3 - 12.32
4 -14.08
5 - 14.08
6 - 13.03
7 - 10.21
8 - 2.11
9 - 3.52

I feel like 4 and 5 are too high, looking for comparison.

Oh and this is over 280 SNGs at stars.

[taipan168]

These are over about 120 PS $5.50s:

1 - 16.67%
2 - 16.67%
3 - 15.83%
4 - 16.67%
5 - 14.17%
6 - 5.83%
7 - 5.83%
8 - 4.17%
9 - 4.17%

[Aplomado]

After 54 10+1 sngs:

1 - 14.75 %
2 - 14.75 %
3 - 13 %
4 - 13 %
5 - 13 %
6 - 3.75%
7 - 13 %
8 - 5.5 %
9 - 3.75 %
10 - 5.5 %

[Lexicon Devil]

Over 625 SnGs at Stars (9-person) and Pokerroom (10-person) (Mostly $109's and $55's, some $215's and $33's)

1st - 19%
2nd - 12%
3rd - 9%
4th - 13%
5th - 12%
6th - 13%
7th - 11%
8th - 7%
9th/10th - 4%


It is my contention that a good player will likely have more 4th-place finishes than 3rd-place finishes. Feel free to discuss.

[boost]

124 22's and 33's on UB, a lil under half are 6max's so I guess my numbers are a bit skewed seeing as there are 4 less place on half of my sngs.

Overall

Finish % Number
1st 25.0% 31
2nd 14.5% 18
3rd 6.5% 8
4th 15.3% 19
5th 19.4% 24
6th 8.9% 11
7th 7.3% 9
8th 1.6% 2
9th 0.0% 0
10th 1.6% 2

22's full
Finish % Number
1st 17.6% 6
2nd 14.7% 5
3rd 5.9% 2
4th 14.7% 5
5th 20.6% 7
6th 8.8% 3
7th 11.8% 4
8th 2.9% 1
9th 0.0% 0
10th 2.9% 1

22's 6max

Finish % Number
1st 33.3% 12
2nd 11.1% 4
3rd 8.3% 3
4th 16.7% 6
5th 19.4% 7
6th 11.1% 4
7th 0.0% 0
8th 0.0% 0
9th 0.0% 0
10th 0.0% 0


33's full

Finish % Number
1st 15.4% 4
2nd 11.5% 3
3rd 11.5% 3
4th 15.4% 4
5th 15.4% 4
6th 3.8% 1
7th 19.2% 5
8th 3.8% 1
9th 0.0% 0
10th 3.8% 1


33's 6max

Finish % Number
1st 32.1% 9
2nd 21.4% 6
3rd 0.0% 0
4th 14.3% 4
5th 21.4% 6
6th 10.7% 3
7th 0.0% 0
8th 0.0% 0
9th 0.0% 0
10th 0.0% 0

[boost]

woah.. I just noticed I havent got 1 3rd in the 33's 6 max... thats pretty cool

[boost]

btw, "high" 4th and 5th are not bad, I read this as good bubble play. Its a good thing if your 4th and 5th spike a bit, then 3rd esp and 2nd too are lower, then first spikes. This shows you are playing for first, and when you get in the money you are getting first. You can limp in the money more, and your 2nd and 3rd will go up but your 1st will definatley go down.

[Rockymv]

You need way more tournaments than any of you posted for these numbers to be anything but variance.

[Lexicon Devil]

A 600+ sample size is meaningless?

Okay here's the 95% confidence interval:

1st: 18.8 +/- 1.5%
2nd: 12.1 +/- 1.3%
3rd: 8.9 +/- 1.1%
4th: 13.3 +/- 1.3%
5th: 12.1 +/- 1.3%
6th: 12.7 +/- 1.3%
7th: 10.8 +/- 1.2%
8th: 7.2 +/- 1.0%
9th: 2.8 +/- 0.7%
10th: 1.3 +/- 0.4%

You need a larger sample size to narrow those down?

The idea that you need thousands of SnGs to draw basic conclusions about your results is an unfortunate myth. If you needed sample sizes in the thousands to make basic conclusions about percentages many public opinion polls wouldn't be feasible, most experiments wouldn't be possible, etc.

[Rockymv]

Didn't see you had 600+. I thought everyone had around 100.

[Borax]

1 - 17.25%
2 - 13.38
3 - 12.32
4 -14.08
5 - 14.08
6 - 13.03
7 - 10.21
8 - 2.11
9 - 3.52

I feel like 4 and 5 are too high, looking for comparison.

Oh and this is over 280 SNGs at stars.

For 261 SNGs at Expekt, Betsson and Pacific.
(201 are 11$ level and 60 are 22$ level)

1 - 13.5%
2 - 16.6
3 - 10.8
4 -13.9
5 - 13.5
6 - 10.8
7 - 8.5
8 - 3.5
9 - 3.5
10- 5.4

[Halv]

91(eg not worth shit) $5.50 SnGs at Pacific:

1st 11,0%
2nd 19,8%
3rd 13,2%
4th 11,0%
5th 17,6%
6th 8,8%
7th 4,4%
8th 5,5%
9th 3,3%
10th 5,5%

Definitly too many 5ths and too few 1sts.