|
|
 Originally Posted by Aplomado
With only 600 invested, you definitely aren't committed. I'd put him on either a pocket pair or A/K high, and he paired his kicker.
That sounds about right. I would add a flush draw to his range, or a nine, and also a small chance that he's doing a stop-and-go and has garbage (which I agree with you, isn't very likely, but it's not impossible). I think if he really liked his hand, he would have let me bet for him, so a hand like JT highly unlikely. He went all-in because he has a medium-strength hand, and is probably scared of all the draws on the board, and he wants me to fold.
My thoughts are, first of all, even if I lose the hand, I'll still be tied for third place and have plenty of chips, so I can afford to call this bet if I'm getting the right pot odds. If I had fewer chips and losing the hand would cripple me, I would fold.
I'm calling 1595 to win 2895, so I need to win 35% of the time for the call to be profitable. I'd like to win a little bit more often than that because according to the SNG payout structure, the chips I'm risking are more valuable than the chips I'd be winning. I didn't have time to do ICM calculations during the SNG, but I decided that if I was good 40% of the time, a call was mandatory.
Let's look at how my hand fares against some of the hands in his range.
A small pair. I'm actually ahead right now, and folding would be a terrible mistake.
Holdem Hi: 990 enumerated boards containing 8c Jd Td
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
5c 5h 450 45.45 516 52.12 24 2.42 0.467
As 9c 516 52.12 450 45.45 24 2.42 0.533
A jack. Against KJ I should call, against QJ it's a marginal fold, and against AJ it's a clear fold. Of these I think AJ is the least likely because I think he would have gone all-in preflop, plus one of the aces is in my hand.
Holdem Hi: 990 enumerated boards containing 8c Jd Td
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Jc Kh 597 60.30 381 38.48 12 1.21 0.609
As 9c 381 38.48 597 60.30 12 1.21 0.391
Holdem Hi: 990 enumerated boards containing 8c Jd Td
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Jc Qh 643 64.95 338 34.14 9 0.91 0.654
As 9c 338 34.14 643 64.95 9 0.91 0.346
Holdem Hi: 990 enumerated boards containing 8c Jd Td
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Jc Ah 663 66.97 287 28.99 40 4.04 0.690
As 9c 287 28.99 663 66.97 40 4.04 0.310
And a couple of other hands he could have. I'm getting the right odds against all of them, except AT which I think is not that likely a hand for him to have, for the reasons I stated above.
Holdem Hi: 990 enumerated boards containing 8c Jd Td
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Ah 8h 546 55.15 383 38.69 61 6.16 0.582
As 9c 383 38.69 546 55.15 61 6.16 0.418
Holdem Hi: 990 enumerated boards containing 8c Jd Td
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Kd Qd 566 57.17 424 42.83 0 0.00 0.572
As 9c 424 42.83 566 57.17 0 0.00 0.428
Holdem Hi: 990 enumerated boards containing 8c Jd Td
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Tc Ah 657 66.36 287 28.99 46 4.65 0.687
As 9c 287 28.99 657 66.36 46 4.65 0.313
As you can see I have enough outs that I'm never making that big of a mistake by calling, but there are a lot of hands in his range where I'm making a huge mistake by folding. Plus there's the chance that he's doing a stop-and-go with shit, in which case I have him owned 3:1.
Basically this hand illustrates my philosophy that if you have a pretty good hand with some outs, and you're getting laid good odds, you should be looking for reasons to call, not reasons to fold. Gamb00L! Gamb00L! Gamb00L!
|