|
|
 Originally Posted by mcatdog
Limping for set value is just a terrible idea when the blinds are this big. You're just wasting 100 chips the majority of the time, and if you do hit your set, you won't win a big enough pot, often enough, to make up for all the times you threw 100 chips into the trash.
88 is probably the best hand at the table and the blinds are big enough that winning them is worth something. You really need to be raising here from this position, but folding is better than limping.
VQC you have PokerAce HUD right? When someone bets into me like this, I like to look at the guy's post-flop stats to decide what are the chances he's making a move on me, and what are the chances he'll fold if I slam in a big raise. Sometimes I fold, sometimes I raise, it just depends on whether I believe him or not.
Wait a minute, the above advice is for if you're up against another big stack. I just noticed the guy only has a few chips left after his flop bet. I'd definitely put him all-in. This looks like the "bus fare" bluff, try to win the pot but leave a little left for bus fare in case it doesn't work. I bet he had shit.
Right limping here is bad so im either folding or raising. I could fold here and care less about it, but i would be throwing away some amount of money. So I raised, In this exact position Im either raising or folding. My only questino is how would I plan on playing this type of hand with a shorty to act after me.
IM at the point in my poker carreer where I can feel like hes shitting me and slam all in over his donk bets. BUt in this case the villians stack is so small that his bet is such a large portion of his stack that it throws me off. Even an All in is so much easier to call here than his 1/3 stack bet.
|