|
|
I was doing some thinking about this hand after I just posted, and I honestly can not see pushing this preflop as a +EV move... The fact is I picked a reasonable range that I would recieve a call...
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
119,861,280 games 0.281 secs 426,552,597 games/sec
Board:
Dead:
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 27.8107 % 25.93% 01.88% { Ac8d }
Hand 2: 72.1893 % 70.30% 01.88% { TT+, ATs+, KQs, AJo+ }
I cant see how picking up 800 chips 80% of the time affects my stack that much to dramtically catapult me into first or second or guarentee i wont bubble... as apposed to the 20% I get called with 1 of those hands and are a big underdog and end up getting crippled on the bubble...
lets do some math...
25% I win so 25% of 20% so I take a huge chip lead 5% of the time.. and almost guarentee myself first or second with solid play there on leaving an avg profit of around 80$ leaving room for those cases where i catch a bad beat and bust 3 or 4...
so 15% of the time I lose and end up bubbling with my measly stack... therfore negative 16$
so 80% of the time i pick up 800 chips and am still a player for first second but third and fourth are now also more viable options since I am not a huge chip lead blinds go around i dont get hands its very plasuable that i can take 3rd 4th and even still possibly bust small but its possible so lets take all the prizes and add up and -16 and find the avg money i would win...
108 + 81 + 54 + 27 - 15 = 63.75
so 5% i win 80$
so 15% I lose 16$
so 80% I win 63$
So if i do this 100 times... 80 x 5 = 400 / 15 x 16 = 240 / and 80 x 63 = 5040 / 5040 + 400 - 240 = 5200$
So i guess this play is very +EV :/ Who looks like a jackass now? Myself 
Someone correct me if im wrong though it was very rough numbers i havent slept yet and im sure something is off but itsj ust a rough example so I guess i should push in this situation...
|