|
 Originally Posted by samsonite2100
I think my hand is best here because I would have expected a raise out of AQ at some point.
Why do you put him on AQ? Past that, whether he has AQ is kind of irrelevant, IMO, from a metagame aspect. What is relevant is that he's a smart ultra-lagg who has position on me.
I still don't see the point of value-betting the river in this situation. What are the hands that he's calling with and I'm beating in that scenario? AQ, no. AJ and A10, and that's about it. Furthermore, wouldn't you expect a very laggy player to at least reraise my flop bet with Ax?
Also, consider the deep stacks. Are you saying that if you bet, say, $20 on the river and he pushes, you're calling with TPTK? I would find that very hard to do...
Ahhh, I see, your afraid of 34,89,56,67,57.
Well, let’s break it down. 34,89,56 had nothing on the flop and would not have stayed in.
67 would have raised the turn…you did say he was aggressive.
That leaves 57 that you are worried about. I very much doubt a pair of 7s would call the turn bet.
Which only leaves A->7,6,5 or Q->7,6,5.
I can’t see him playing Q->7,6,5 but that is debatable, I don’t know him.
So we are left with A->7,6,5 you are worried about. Which again, I would expect a raise out of A7, A6. leaving A5. I value bet the river because he can’t be that lucky.
|