I just scrolled down the list and found a thread that served my point. Take a look at this post: http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...oker-35562.htm

Can you honestly tell me that this HH is easy to read and interpret? Is it enjoyable? If you answered no, then do what most people do and convert it. If it doesn't work, just make a short, generic hand history that is easy to read.

If you answered yes, you're lying.
Point of contention
I understand that HH and i found it readable. Im not lying.
The point is ive played on that site and have had to use/understand that type of HH. I took the time out to learn it because i had no choice. While party and stars may do exquiste HH's other sites do not. Please bear that in mind.
Secondly, if i have to convert my hand then i want to see an established code of how to do it or else get the HHconverter to work properly with these types of hands. Otherwise im going out of my way to produce something that you might just go 'that HH sucks' or 'it hasnt been converted' which quite frankly pisses me off.
This arguement works both ways, so if we have problems just stick a method up highlighting how non-standard HH's from 'other sites' should be handled. I try my best as one who has played poker away from the major sites for a while and actually find this post quite offensive as it can take me half an hr to post one hand because the HHconverter doesnt work with the format i have and yet when i try to get around that problem a post appears pretty much saying 'dont do that!'