Some (possibly meaningless) Tribeca stats.

[ShowMeAtlas]

I didn't know they had they had this. Here are my stats for 1461 hands in 9 seater STTs since 30 September (I don't know why it only goes back that far). This is probably a horrifically small sample size but I thought I'd post it anyway. Some of them are definitely wrong but maybe someone can post theirs and I can compare. Anywho,

Games won - 19% <--?
Flops seen - 26% <--this seems very high

Showdowns won - 0% <--WTF?
Wins if flop seen - 35%

Percentage of actions:
Fold - 49%
Check - 19%
Call - 11%
Bet - 8%
Raise - 12%
Re-raise - 1%

Percentage of folds:
Pre-flop - 65%
Flop - 9%
Turn - 3%
River - 2%
No fold - 21%

[fjuanl]

play less hands.

your betting % needs to be higher than your calling %

calling is bad because you have to win at showdown to take the pot. if you bet you can take the pot two ways: by making others fold or winning at showdown

[ShowMeAtlas]

tbh, that must means these stats are bollocks, since I play very tight.

[JeffreyGB]

I agree that you should be betting more than calling. Otherwise, I don't see anything that draws my attention.

You don't need to worry about 26% VPIP in SnGs - that's plenty tight (perhaps even too much so) given that things get much looser as you get short handed.

[johnny_fish]

You don't need to worry about 26% VPIP in SnGs - that's plenty tight (perhaps even too much so) given that things get much looser as you get short handed.

I was 22/16 in the Party speeds. 26% seems loose to me in a regular sng.

[MuddyWicket]

If those are from Victor Chandler then the showdowns Won NEVER goes above zero. Apparently i havent won a single showdown in 3k of hands.....