Peer Review

[Wooderson]

Over the last two years I have compiled over 1200 SnGs. According to Poker Tracker my RoI is just under 44%. Frankly I think it is more dumb luck than skill.

Over the last 10 days I've hit a rough patch. I could chalk it up to the low end of variance, but I'm more interested in hearing what some of you think about my mis-plays. I think it has more to do with that than it does variance.

I've got 24 HH to share. No way in hell I'm going to post them and subject you to them, but if anyone is interested in helping me via peer review I would greatly appreciate it.

Pre-1
Pre-2

[taipan168]

I'd be happy to look at a few HHs. What buyin are your SNGs? Alternatively, you can post a few of them here and get everybody to look through them.

44% is a tremendous ROI over 1200 games BTW!

[FlyingSaucy]

There's nothing i can tell you that will improve your game, if you have 44% ROI over 1200 games. Can you review mine?

[Wooderson]

As I learn to use PT I am increasingly wary of that number. I think my actual number is much less... high 20s maybe.** There are a number of tournies I don't have tournament summaries for. But the flase number makes me feel warm, unlike my recent streak of being kicked in the nuts.

I play $5.50 PokerStars SnGs. I have two histories posted, but I have a series of 24 that I would love to have looked at by some objective eyes that are connected to a significantly better tuned poker mind than mine.

**Edit. Much to the assumption of many of you, I'm a tard. I was looking at my ITM% this whole time. It is 47.62%. My RoI is 24.57%, but over the last 24 games is just at 16%.