Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

super four bet squezze

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1

    Default super four bet squezze

    people behind are tight taggs, reraiser is unknown.
    PokerStars Game #8455705391: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2007/02/15 - 15:41:32 (ET)
    Table 'Dione V' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
    Seat 1: DropkickMK ($90.15 in chips)
    Seat 2: ahmngrn30 ($100.50 in chips)
    Seat 3: I pRaXiS I ($120.75 in chips)
    Seat 4: xosamsamox ($44.75 in chips)
    Seat 5: redgrape ($167.95 in chips)
    Seat 6: MadSkillz609 ($94.95 in chips)
    ahmngrn30: posts small blind $0.50
    I pRaXiS I: posts big blind $1
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to redgrape [As 5s]
    xosamsamox: folds
    redgrape: raises $3 to $4
    MadSkillz609: calls $4
    DropkickMK: calls $4
    ahmngrn30: raises $15 to $19
    I pRaXiS I: folds
    redgrape: raises $148.95 to $167.95 and is all-in
    Check out the new blog!!!
  2. #2
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    good vs the right villains occasionally. i'd like a better A (ie AT+) to do this, but whatever. i would be leary in this spot since reraiser is unknown.
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  3. #3
    I just thought most people aren't raising this much with AA.
    Check out the new blog!!!
  4. #4
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    um its not even pot.

    I fold 100% of the time here, this isn't 5/10.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Renton
    um its not even pot.

    I fold 100% of the time here, this isn't 5/10.
    I don't have to win this that much, do the math.

    pokerstove would prob say 25% against a call.
    I need him to fold like 20% of the time.
    Check out the new blog!!!
  6. #6
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    ok the reason i fold 100% of the time is as follows:

    We don't know his reraise range. We can make an assumption about it but that assumption would be wrong a massive percentage of the time. Likely its AK QQ+. It could be AQ+ JJ+. It could be KK+.

    Obviously if his range is KK+, we're making a very poor play since he always calls and we're always dominated.

    But what if his range is AK QQ+? He still pretty much always calls. He might fold very seldomly, but probably not enough to make our play profitable.

    So basically, we're banking on an unknown player having a wide (enough) reraise range to fold it X percent of the time.

    And X isn't 20. X is much greater than 20 because of our uncertainty that he even is reraising a wide enough range to begin with.

    ONTOPPPPATHAT: The players in the middle MIGHT have been getting cute with a hand. You seem to be completely disregarding this possibility but it certainly does adversely affect the equity of this play.

    Too uncertain, i fold.
  7. #7
    Galapogos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,876
    Location
    The Loser's Lounge
    I never make this play against an unknown.


    Quote Originally Posted by sauce123
    I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
  8. #8
    don't like it much with no read on the reraiser, but if he can squeeze with a wide enough range then it looks good.

    I actually did rough math out of curiosoity...with help from CTS's blog on this at http://www.cardrunners.com/fusetalk/...h=10&year=2006

    he calls: you either win 112$ from him and the callers, or lose 96 from effective stack minus your pfr. so...
    30% x 112 = 34
    -70% x 96 = -67
    total: -33bb expectation when called

    folds: you take the ~30$ pot
    30bb expectaion when he folds

    so you actually need him to fold about 50% of the time for 0ev.
  9. #9
    I tried this about a dozen times recently. I won 3 hands when I spiked an A v KK, KK, QQ. I got ZERO folds. At small stakes this play is highly unprofitable.
    "It is impossible for you to learn what you think you already know."
  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Renton
    um its not even pot.
    TheXianti: (Triptanes) why are you not a thinking person?
  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Jager
    I tried this about a dozen times recently. I won 3 hands when I spiked an A v KK, KK, QQ. I got ZERO folds. At small stakes this play is highly unprofitable.
    I really disagree with this. When I was playing at FT a lot and running into very aggressive regulars I was making a play similar to this [I open, maybe a call in between, and then a 3bet, i then shove] somewhat consistently and was having very good results with it. Could be short term luck, but it wasnt just for a day or two.
  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Jager
    I tried this about a dozen times recently. I won 3 hands when I spiked an A v KK, KK, QQ. I got ZERO folds. At small stakes this play is highly unprofitable.
    You may have been running into bad luck. But yeah normally i don't do it unless I'm pretty sure opp has big range of raise and small range of calling.
    Check out the new blog!!!
  13. #13
    lol ur terrible at poker
  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by rebuyman
    lol ur terrible at poker
    god i hope there is an inside joke I'm unaware of...
  15. #15
    I'm pretty sure there is no inside joke.
    Check out the new blog!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •