|
shit...now im re-rethinking the fold. running bad could effect my thinking, and KcXc makes about as much sense as 33. figured he'd take some more time on the turn with Kxcc but that's not definite.
kinda surprised nobody mentioned the nuts yet though (64s).
fwiw here's a pokerstove calculation:
Board: 7c 5c 3s Ks
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 36.818% 36.82% 00.00% 162 0.00 { 7h5d }
Hand 1: 63.182% 63.18% 00.00% 278 0.00 { 33, As7s, KcQc, KcJc, KcTc, Kc9c, 6c4c, 6s4s }
meh, even with the semibluffs it looks close. i still like the fold. i think he expected me to raise the flop and was too passive to not have a big hand most of the time.
btw griffey- i don't thinke ur logic is flawed, but still when someone who seems passive puts their stack in the chances have to go up of 777 or 555.
|