Starting to get into SNG's should I play 9, 18, 27 or 45 man SNG's. I am using the SNG to help me get better at MTT. Is this a good approach? I am coming over from cash games and have a roll of $1,500.00 so it will be low limit.
|
06-20-2007 11:18 PM
#1
| |
| |
|
06-21-2007 08:19 AM
#2
| |
![]()
|
The best practice you can get for an MTT is playing an MTT. |
|
06-21-2007 10:30 AM
#3
| |
Sngs are totally different from MTT's. To get better, you need to play alot of them. develop a strategy and move up. Everyones strategy is different, there are no 'right' or 'wrong' ways to play a MTT. | |
|
| |
|
06-21-2007 10:36 AM
#4
| |
![]()
|
I'd think about playing the 45's and the 180's. I wouldn't bother so much about the scheduled tourneys on stars - the fields are so huge final tables will be few and far between. If you play smaller tourneys, you'll get a bunch more experience of playing the later stages. |
|
06-21-2007 11:28 AM
#5
| |
I would go with the $4.40 180's for awhile until you get your feet wet and then move up to the $11. These, IMO, are better for learning MTTs since they have a smaller field and the blind levels are the same as most major tourneys on Stars. The 45 man SNGs have 10 min blind levels. | |
|
06-21-2007 11:43 AM
#6
| |
The 90 man's on Full Tilt are pretty much a smaller multi table. There good because you get the early play, middle play, bubble play, final table bubble play, and then a full final table play because it pays 18 places rather then 6 places like the 45 man. | |
|
| |
|
06-21-2007 11:46 AM
#7
| |
Yup - the 180 man tourneys on Stars are a great way to start. They're big enough that you play for a while to get to the FT, but not too big either so you aren't playing forever and fting/winning is actually attainable. | |
| |