Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
REGISTER
Subscribe to FTR web feed
Poker Forum › Tournament Poker ›

Push 66? - 6 max regular

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. 09-17-2007 04:46 PM #1
    marmot's Avatar
    marmot
    marmot is offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    252

    Default Push 66? - 6 max regular

    Dazzler seems quite good, maybe a bit loose. Push here / fold?

    PokerStars Game #12113832942: Tournament #61472182, $6.00+$0.60 Hold'em No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2007/09/17 - 16:40:26 (ET)
    Table '61472182 1' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
    Seat 2: apelman (1385 in chips)
    Seat 3: Dazzler69 (3140 in chips)
    Seat 4: joeyebee (1565 in chips)
    Seat 6: GPOW79 (2910 in chips)
    GPOW79: posts small blind 75
    apelman: posts big blind 150
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to GPOW79 [6h 6c]
    Dazzler69: raises 300 to 450
    joeyebee: folds
    GPOW79??????????
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  2. 09-17-2007 05:11 PM #2
    TwoKicker
    TwoKicker is offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    251
    Location
    The U of K
    Fold with yours and his stack
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  3. 09-17-2007 05:17 PM #3
    Geanosssss's Avatar
    Geanosssss
    Geanosssss is offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    539
    Yeah I deffo dont push here
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  4. 09-17-2007 09:27 PM #4
    taipan168
    taipan168 is offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,608
    Location
    Sydney
    Definitely not. There's a key principle here, which is "when you're the second stack, don't f**k with the big stack without a monster hand." 66 is definitely not a monster hand here!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  5. 09-17-2007 11:39 PM #5
    mike4066's Avatar
    mike4066
    mike4066 is offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,663
    Quote Originally Posted by taipan168
    Definitely not. There's a key principle here, which is "when you're the second stack, don't f**k with the big stack without a monster hand." 66 is definitely not a monster hand here!
    qft

    Taipan and i disagree on some things but not this one
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules